According to the ethical guidelines for conducting research with clients, patients, students, or subordinates, what specific protections must psychologists provide to these participants if they decline or withdraw from a study? Additionally, what must be offered to students if research participation is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit?
Question: According to the ethical guidelines for conducting research with clients, patients, students, or subordinates, what specific protections must psychologists provide to these participants if they decline or withdraw from a study? Additionally, what must be offered to students if research participation is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit?
Sample answer: Psychologists must take special steps to protect clients, patients, students, or subordinates from any adverse consequences if they choose to decline or withdraw from a study. If participation is a course requirement or an extra credit opportunity, students must be provided with equitable alternative activities to ensure their involvement is voluntary.
Key points:
- Protecting participants from adverse consequences if they decline or withdraw.
- Offering equitable alternative activities to student participants when participation is required or offered for extra credit.
- Ensuring that participation remains voluntary.
Rubric: Score 3/3: Mentions both the protection from adverse consequences upon declining/withdrawing and the provision of equitable alternative activities for students to ensure voluntary participation. Score 2/3: Mentions protection from adverse consequences but fails to explain the requirement of equitable alternatives for course credit, or vice versa. Score 1/3: Mentions voluntary participation or ethical treatment generally but does not recall the specific protections or requirements. Score 0/3: Incomplete or incorrect answer.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
What special precaution must psychologists take when conducting research that involves clients, patients, students, or subordinates as participants?
In psychological research involving participants in positions of dependency or subordination, match each group with the specific ethical protection required to ensure their participation is voluntary.
A psychology professor offers students extra credit for participating in a 30-minute laboratory study. Students who do not wish to participate are told they can earn the same amount of credit by writing a 5-page research paper that typically takes 3 hours to complete. This scenario satisfies the ethical requirement to provide equitable alternative activities for student participants.
Analyze the recruitment procedures below for a psychology research study involving a professor's own students. Arrange these procedures in the logical order that reflects an increasing level of adherence to ethical protections, starting from the highest risk of coercion and ending with the highest level of voluntary participation.
The ethical protection of students and subordinates from adverse consequences applies only when they choose to decline participation initially, but not if they choose to withdraw from the study at a later time.
In psychological research, what is the primary purpose of requiring that alternative activities offered to students be 'equitable' to the research participation itself?
When evaluating the ethics of a research study that offers extra credit to students, a researcher must determine whether the alternative activities provided are _____ in order to ensure that students' participation is truly voluntary.
Match each research scenario to the specific ethical requirement it illustrates under APA guidelines for studies involving clients, patients, students, or subordinates.
When analyzing why APA ethics guidelines require an equitable alternative activity for students in a researcher's own course, the core concern is that academic credit combined with an instructor's evaluative authority can transform what appears to be an invitation into a form of _____, rendering consent non-voluntary.
An IRB reviewer is evaluating whether a proposed study adequately protects student participants recruited from the researcher's own course. Order the following evaluative criteria from most foundational—must be satisfied before any other safeguard is meaningful—to most supplementary—adds protection only once prior conditions are in place.
According to the ethical guidelines for conducting research with clients, patients, students, or subordinates, what specific protections must psychologists provide to these participants if they decline or withdraw from a study? Additionally, what must be offered to students if research participation is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit?
Based on the ethical guidelines for research involving student participants, explain why Dr. Aris's recruitment design violates the requirement for voluntary participation, and describe how she should modify the alternative option to make it ethical.
A clinical psychologist recruits their current therapy clients to participate in a new clinical trial. Apply the ethical guidelines for subordinate/client research to write a one-sentence statement the psychologist should include in the informed consent form to protect clients from adverse consequences if they decide to withdraw mid-study.