Learn Before
Client/Patient, Student, and Subordinate Research Participants
When psychologists conduct research involving clients, patients, students, or subordinates as participants, they must take special steps to protect these individuals from any adverse consequences if they choose to decline or withdraw from the study. Additionally, if research participation is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit, prospective student participants must be given the choice of equitable alternative activities to ensure their involvement is voluntary.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Variations in Consent Forms
Pre-Consent Information Disclosure
Informed Consent Script
Implied Consent in Survey Research
Informed Consent Form
Multiple-Choice: Voluntary Participation
Dispensing With Informed Consent
Research Protocol
Allocating Time for Consent and Debriefing
Informed Consent for Recording Voices and Images
Client/Patient, Student, and Subordinate Research Participants
Arguments Against Animal Research
Withholding the Research Question
Which of the following best defines the process of informed consent in psychological research?
In psychological research, the process of informed consent follows a logical series of steps to ensure ethical participation. Arrange these steps in the correct chronological order from start to finish.
A researcher is preparing an informed consent process for a new study on social psychology. Match each specific researcher action with the component of the informed consent process it primarily addresses.
True or False: A researcher who provides a detailed list of all study procedures and risks but offers a financial reward so large that participants feel they cannot realistically decline has successfully fulfilled the ethical requirements of informed consent.
In psychological research, what is the primary purpose of the informed consent process?
A researcher is conducting a psychological study and needs to follow the informed consent process. Arrange the following steps in the correct chronological order to ensure the process is handled according to ethical standards.
A researcher is conducting a study on the relationship between noise and concentration. Match each action taken by the researcher during the intake process to the component of informed consent it represents.
A researcher obtains a signed consent form after explaining the study's procedures but omits a minor risk that could reasonably influence an individual's decision to participate. In this scenario, the ethical requirement of informed consent is met because the participant's agreement was voluntary and documented.
In psychological research, what does the ethical process of obtaining informed consent require a researcher to do?
A participant who signs a consent form after being told the study's general purpose has given valid informed consent, even if specific risks that could reasonably affect their decision were not disclosed.
A researcher conducting a study on cognitive performance offers participants a bonus that is ten times the average hourly wage for a five-minute task. An ethical review board evaluating this protocol would likely determine that the process is compromised because the excessive incentive creates a form of pressure that prevents the participant's agreement from being truly _____.
When an Institutional Review Board evaluates a researcher's decision to omit a specific procedural detail from the consent process, they are judging whether that detail is something that might _____ a person's decision to participate in the study.
A researcher is designing a laboratory experiment to study the effects of high-intensity white noise on cognitive task performance. The study will take approximately 30 minutes, may cause temporary mild frustration or headache, and offers a $5 compensation. Participants will be recruited from undergraduate psychology courses. Describe how the researcher should apply the principles of informed consent to this specific study design. Specifically, outline the crucial components of the consent process that must be documented and explained to the participants before the study begins.
Analyze Dr. Aris's research procedure. Identify the specific ethical violations regarding the informed consent process in this scenario. Explain how these violations undermine the participants' autonomy and expose them to potential undisclosed harms.
A researcher argues that they can dispense with obtaining informed consent for a study where they observe and record the walking speed of shoppers in a public mall, noting only estimated age and gender without collecting any identifying information. Evaluate whether the researcher's decision to dispense with informed consent is ethically justified based on standard research ethics criteria.
Learn After
What special precaution must psychologists take when conducting research that involves clients, patients, students, or subordinates as participants?
In psychological research involving participants in positions of dependency or subordination, match each group with the specific ethical protection required to ensure their participation is voluntary.
A psychology professor offers students extra credit for participating in a 30-minute laboratory study. Students who do not wish to participate are told they can earn the same amount of credit by writing a 5-page research paper that typically takes 3 hours to complete. This scenario satisfies the ethical requirement to provide equitable alternative activities for student participants.
Analyze the recruitment procedures below for a psychology research study involving a professor's own students. Arrange these procedures in the logical order that reflects an increasing level of adherence to ethical protections, starting from the highest risk of coercion and ending with the highest level of voluntary participation.
The ethical protection of students and subordinates from adverse consequences applies only when they choose to decline participation initially, but not if they choose to withdraw from the study at a later time.
In psychological research, what is the primary purpose of requiring that alternative activities offered to students be 'equitable' to the research participation itself?
When evaluating the ethics of a research study that offers extra credit to students, a researcher must determine whether the alternative activities provided are _____ in order to ensure that students' participation is truly voluntary.
Match each research scenario to the specific ethical requirement it illustrates under APA guidelines for studies involving clients, patients, students, or subordinates.
When analyzing why APA ethics guidelines require an equitable alternative activity for students in a researcher's own course, the core concern is that academic credit combined with an instructor's evaluative authority can transform what appears to be an invitation into a form of _____, rendering consent non-voluntary.
An IRB reviewer is evaluating whether a proposed study adequately protects student participants recruited from the researcher's own course. Order the following evaluative criteria from most foundational—must be satisfied before any other safeguard is meaningful—to most supplementary—adds protection only once prior conditions are in place.
According to the ethical guidelines for conducting research with clients, patients, students, or subordinates, what specific protections must psychologists provide to these participants if they decline or withdraw from a study? Additionally, what must be offered to students if research participation is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit?
Based on the ethical guidelines for research involving student participants, explain why Dr. Aris's recruitment design violates the requirement for voluntary participation, and describe how she should modify the alternative option to make it ethical.
A clinical psychologist recruits their current therapy clients to participate in a new clinical trial. Apply the ethical guidelines for subordinate/client research to write a one-sentence statement the psychologist should include in the informed consent form to protect clients from adverse consequences if they decide to withdraw mid-study.