If a researcher needs to make anything other than a minor change to their study after it has begun, they must seek additional formal approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or relevant ethics committee before implementing the modification to the research design or procedure.

Protocol Modification Approval

During an ongoing research study, investigators must continuously monitor their participants for any unanticipated reactions. If participants exhibit unexpected distress or negative responses, researchers should seek their feedback during the debriefing process and must be prepared to adjust the study's procedures to ensure ethical compliance and participant safety.

Monitoring Participants for Unanticipated Reactions

During an ongoing study, what must a researcher do if they need to make significant adjustments to their previously approved research plan?

A researcher's ethical obligations do not end once a study receives institutional approval. It is critical to adhere strictly to the submitted research protocol throughout the study. If any adjustments beyond minor changes are required, the researcher must seek additional approval from the institutional review board before implementing those modifications.

Google

A research protocol is a detailed, formal document outlining a proposed scientific study that investigators must submit for institutional approval. It comprehensively describes the study's core objectives, methodological design, step-by-step procedures, risk-benefit assessment, strategies to minimize potential participant harm, and plans for obtaining informed consent and conducting debriefing.

Research Protocol

Before beginning a study, researchers must secure formal permission from their institution or course instructor, following specific local policies. This procedure typically requires submitting a detailed research protocol to an oversight committee, like an Institutional Review Board (IRB), to confirm that the proposed study adheres to ethical standards and adequately safeguards participants.

Institutional Approval

https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/

KPU Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition

Adhering to the Protocol

An institutional review board is a committee required by federal regulations for universities, hospitals, and other institutions receiving federal support. Its responsibility is to review research protocols for potential ethical problems, ensuring that risks are minimized, benefits outweigh risks, research is conducted fairly, and informed consent procedures are adequate. The board must consist of at least five people with diverse backgrounds, including scientists and nonscientists, men and women, various professions, and at least one person unaffiliated with the institution.

Institutional Review Board

During the institutional review, an Institutional Review Board (IRB) may identify ethical concerns or questions about a proposed study. Researchers must respond to these inquiries in good faith and without delay, which may require them to make additional modifications to their research design and procedures to better protect participants prior to resubmitting their protocol.

Addressing IRB Concerns

Which of the following best describes a research protocol?

Researchers should view the institutional approval process not as a bureaucratic hurdle, but as a constructive opportunity to thoroughly consider the ethical dimensions of their study. This process encourages consultation with committee members and peers who can offer diverse perspectives and extensive experience, thereby enhancing the research's ethical foundation.

Learn Before

Related

Learn After