Learn Before
Adhering to the Protocol
A researcher's ethical obligations do not end once a study receives institutional approval. It is critical to adhere strictly to the submitted research protocol throughout the study. If any adjustments beyond minor changes are required, the researcher must seek additional approval from the institutional review board before implementing those modifications.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Institutional Approval
Adhering to the Protocol
Institutional Review Board
Addressing IRB Concerns
Which of the following best describes a research protocol?
A research protocol focuses exclusively on detailing the methodological design of a proposed study, while plans for participant protection are handled informally as the research progresses.
A psychology researcher is drafting a formal research protocol for a new study on 'The Effect of Sleep Deprivation on Memory Recall.' Match each specific excerpt from their proposal draft to the standard section of the protocol it represents.
A psychological researcher is organizing a formal research protocol to justify a new study to an institutional review committee. Arrange the following components in the order of their logical dependency, where each step provides the necessary justification for the analytical component that follows.
Imagine you are developing a formal research protocol for a study investigating how 'negative social feedback' impacts physiological stress levels. To create a document that successfully synthesizes your methodological rigor with the required ethical safeguards for institutional approval, which combination of elements must be integrated into your proposal?
An institutional review board rejects a research protocol that is scientifically sound but provides vague details on how potential harm to participants will be managed. This decision is based on the evaluative judgment that the protocol is _____ for approval because it does not allow the board to verify that the study's benefits justify its potential risks.
Before beginning a scientific study, investigators must submit a detailed, formal document outlining the proposed research for institutional approval. This document is known as a research _____.
Value of the Institutional Approval Process
Addressing IRB Concerns
Adhering to the Protocol
What is the primary purpose of securing institutional approval before beginning a research study?
A researcher may begin a study immediately after submitting a detailed research protocol to an oversight committee, provided they intend to adhere strictly to ethical standards.
Dr. Miller is planning a new laboratory study to investigate the effects of social media use on teenage self-esteem. To adhere to the requirements for Institutional Approval, in which order should Dr. Miller perform the following steps?
To obtain institutional approval, researchers must submit a protocol that allows an oversight committee to evaluate the ethical implications of their study. Match each specific research protocol detail with the ethical concern an Institutional Review Board (IRB) must analyze to determine if approval should be granted.
In addition to a formal oversight committee such as an Institutional Review Board (IRB), who else is explicitly authorized to provide the formal permission required for institutional approval in many academic settings?
To understand the institutional approval process, match each element of the ethical review with the description that best explains its role.
A researcher receives a notification from an oversight committee stating their study is 'Approved Pending Minor Revisions.' The researcher decides to start the study immediately, believing that the required changes to the consent form wording are a mere formality. In evaluating this decision against professional ethical standards, the researcher's action is considered unauthorized because they have not yet secured the final, formal _____ required before data collection begins.
Dr. Smith is conducting a psychology study on stress and memory. Because the study is for an undergraduate class and uses a low-risk online survey, she is permitted to begin administering the survey to classmates while waiting for her instructor to review and formally approve her research protocol.
An oversight committee such as an Institutional Review Board (IRB) evaluates research proposals to confirm they meet ethical standards. To facilitate this review, researchers must submit a detailed document describing the study's purpose, design, risks, benefits, and participant safeguards, which is known as a research _____.
Evaluate the following stages of the ethical research workflow. Order them chronologically to show how a researcher properly integrates institutional approval into their study from start to finish.
Learn After
Protocol Modification Approval
Monitoring Participants for Unanticipated Reactions
During an ongoing study, what must a researcher do if they need to make significant adjustments to their previously approved research plan?
In a psychology study, a researcher is ethically permitted to implement significant modifications to their approved plan as long as they notify the institutional review board shortly after the changes have been put into practice.
A researcher is conducting an approved laboratory study on attention. Halfway through data collection, the researcher decides to change the computer task to a more challenging version to better capture the effect they are looking for. Arrange the steps the researcher must take to ethically implement this change in the correct order.
Match each researcher's action to the appropriate analysis of their ethical obligation regarding protocol adherence.
A researcher is ethically obligated to adhere strictly to the submitted research protocol throughout the entire duration of a study, even after receiving institutional approval.
In psychological research, what does it mean for a researcher to have an 'ongoing ethical obligation' to adhere to their protocol after receiving institutional approval?
A researcher who has received IRB approval for a study later considers several adjustments during data collection. Match each adjustment to the appropriate protocol-adherence decision a researcher must apply.
When analyzing whether a mid-study change requires new institutional review board approval, the central distinction is whether the modification is _____ or significant—researchers can proceed with the former on their own authority, but must obtain IRB review and approval before implementing the latter.
A researcher is midway through an IRB-approved study and determines that a meaningful procedural change is needed—one that goes beyond a minor adjustment. Evaluate and arrange the steps below into the ethically correct order the researcher must follow before and after making the change.
In the ethical evaluation of a researcher's conduct, implementing a modification to an approved study without first obtaining permission from the _____ is considered a violation of protocol adherence, regardless of the researcher's personal justification.
Describe the scope and duration of a researcher's ethical obligations concerning protocol adherence after their study receives initial institutional approval, including the protocol modification process.
Based on the rules of protocol adherence, diagnose the ethical issue in the researcher's decision to change the task length and explain what action they should have taken.
A psychological researcher has institutional approval to conduct a study where participants view pictures of household objects. The researcher decides mid-study to change the stimulus to pictures of aggressive animals to investigate a different emotional response. Apply the rules of protocol adherence to state what the researcher must do before executing this change.