Advising on a Financial Windfall
An economic advisor is counseling a client who has just received a one-time, tax-free inheritance of $100,000. This is the client's only source of funds for the next two periods (e.g., two years). The client is considering two simple options:
- Plan A: Spend the entire $100,000 in the first period and have nothing for the second period.
- Plan B: Spend $50,000 in the first period and save the remaining $50,000 to spend in the second period.
As the advisor, which plan would you recommend to maximize the client's overall well-being or satisfaction across the two periods? Justify your recommendation using a core economic principle related to how individuals derive satisfaction from consumption.
0
1
Tags
CORE Econ
Economics
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Marco's Simple Saving Method: Storing Cash
Figure 9.7: Marco's Optimal Choice When Storing Cash
Activity: Constructing Marco's Feasible Frontier
Marco's Investment Opportunity in Grain
The Cost of Storing Grain due to Depreciation
Figure 9.12: Marco's Four Financial Schemes and Feasible Frontiers
An individual receives a one-time payment of $100 today and expects no income in the next period. Their main preference is to avoid large fluctuations in their spending, aiming for a relatively stable level of consumption across both periods. Given this preference, which of the following strategies is the most logical for them to adopt?
Evaluating a Consumption Choice
Evaluating Intertemporal Spending Plans
Consider an individual who receives a one-time income of $100 today and expects no income in the future. If this individual decides to save half of their income for the future, it necessarily means they place a higher value on future consumption than on present consumption.
Advising on a Financial Windfall
An individual has $100 available to spend today and expects to have no income in the future. They have a preference for maintaining a relatively stable level of consumption over time, rather than spending a lot in one period and very little in another. This preference can be represented by indifference curves that are bowed-in towards the origin on a graph plotting 'consumption today' versus 'consumption in the future'.
If the only way for this individual to save is to store the cash, creating a 1-for-1 trade-off between spending today and spending in the future, which of the following best describes their optimal consumption choice?
An individual receives a one-time financial windfall of $10,000 and anticipates having no other source of income for the current period or the next. This person's primary goal is to achieve the highest possible overall satisfaction from their consumption across both periods. They decide to spend the entire $10,000 in the current period. From an economic standpoint, why is this decision likely to be suboptimal?
Analyzing Intertemporal Consumption Choices
An individual receives a one-time endowment of $100 today and expects no income in the future. They can save simply by storing cash, meaning $1 saved today becomes $1 available in the future. Their goal is to maximize their total satisfaction across both periods, and they have a preference for smoothing their consumption. Match each potential consumption plan with the most accurate economic description of that choice.
The Rationale for Saving
Explaining Disparate Outcomes: The Impact of Situational Differences on Identical Preferences
Marco's Suboptimal Choice of Consuming His Entire Endowment
Assumptions for the Storing Cash Model: No Theft and Zero Inflation
Lending as a Saving Strategy for Marco