Multiple Choice

An economist observes two individuals, Sam and Chris, who have identical preferences for consumption now versus in the future, meaning they share the same degree of intrinsic impatience. Sam's entire endowment is $500 available today, while Chris's entire endowment is $500 available in the future. Sam chooses to save a portion of his endowment, and Chris chooses to borrow against his future endowment. The economist concludes, 'Since their preferences are identical, their opposite financial actions must be due to one of them acting irrationally.' Which statement best evaluates the economist's conclusion?

0

1

Updated 2025-09-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

CORE Econ

Economics

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

Economy

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Ch.9 Lenders and borrowers and differences in wealth - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

Related