Case Study

Analyzing a Flawed Research Design

A researcher is studying the impact of initial funding on the long-term survival of new businesses. They form two groups:

  • Group A: Entrepreneurs who started their business using a large, unexpected inheritance.
  • Group B: Entrepreneurs who started their business using a standard bank loan.

The researcher plans to track the business survival rates of both groups over five years. A colleague points out a critical flaw in this research design, arguing that the two groups are not truly comparable for isolating the effect of the funding source.

Explain the most likely reason for the colleague's criticism. Specifically, what underlying difference between the two groups (other than the source of funds) could systematically affect the study's outcome?

0

1

Updated 2025-07-31

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Science

Economy

CORE Econ

Social Science

Empirical Science

Economics

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Related