Analyzing Eyeball Dev Set Error Volumes
Question: Discuss the recommended baseline number of errors to manually review in an Eyeball dev set and explain the condition under which reviewing significantly more errors is considered acceptable.
Sample answer: The recommended baseline is to manually review approximately 100 mistakes in an Eyeball dev set. This amount provides a very good sense of the major sources of errors the algorithm is making. However, some practitioners choose to analyze even more errors, sometimes up to 500. Doing so is acceptable and causes no harm as long as there is enough data available to support the expanded review.
Key points:
- Baseline of ~100 mistakes
- Provides a very good sense of major error sources
- Can review more errors (e.g., 500)
- Must have enough data to review more
Rubric: A strong answer will explicitly state the baseline of 100 mistakes, explain its purpose (finding major error sources), and correctly identify the condition for reviewing more errors (having enough data).
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Machine Learning Strategy
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
Sufficient Mistakes for Error Sense
Harm in Analyzing More Errors
Baseline Number for _____ Mistakes
Matching Error Quantities to Concepts
Decision Process for Eyeball Dev Set Review
Analyzing Eyeball Dev Set Error Volumes
Scaling Up Manual Review
Primary Benefit of 100 Mistakes
Condition for Reviewing More Errors
Sense of Error Sources from 100 Mistakes