Learn Before
Applying the Benefit vs. Economic Cost Rule to a Concert Decision
To determine if an action is economically rational, one can apply the rule that the action should be taken only if its benefit is greater than its economic cost. For instance, in deciding whether to attend a concert, the components are assessed as follows:
- Benefit: The subjective enjoyment from the concert, valued at $55.
- Economic Cost: The sum of the direct cost (ticket price) and the opportunity cost (value of the next best alternative).
Since the benefit of $55 is greater than the economic cost of $47, the decision to attend the concert is justified.
0
1
Tags
CORE Econ
Economics
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.2 Technology and incentives - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Applying the Benefit vs. Economic Cost Rule to a Concert Decision
Freelance Project Decision
Alex is considering taking a weekend job that pays $150. To take the job, Alex must buy a uniform for $20. If Alex doesn't take the job, the next best use of their time is tutoring, which they value at $100. Based on a comparison of the total benefit and the full cost of the decision, what should Alex do and why?
Workshop Attendance Decision
A student argues that accepting a free ticket to a 4-hour concert is always a rational choice, as long as they derive at least some small enjoyment from it. They reason that since the ticket costs nothing, the benefit (enjoyment) will always outweigh the cost ($0). Is this reasoning sound according to the principle of comparing total benefits to full economic costs?
Coffee Shop Upgrade Evaluation
Evaluating a Business Software Decision
A marketing manager is deciding whether to attend a one-day conference. The conference ticket costs $200. Attending means they will miss a day of work where they would have earned $300. The manager values the knowledge and networking from the conference at $600. Match each component of the decision-making process to its correct value based on this scenario.
A student is deciding whether to spend their Saturday afternoon working a 4-hour shift at a cafe for $60 or going to a movie with friends. The movie ticket costs $15. The student values the enjoyment of seeing the movie with friends at $80. To make a rational decision, the student should only go to the movie if the enjoyment is greater than the full sacrifice involved. In this case, the full sacrifice, or total economic cost, of going to the movie is $____. (Enter a number only)
A student is using a structured process to decide whether to spend money on a ticket for a social event. Arrange the following steps into the logical order they should be performed to determine if attending the event is a worthwhile choice.
A student is deciding whether to go on a weekend trip. They value the enjoyment of the trip at $300. The trip will cost them $120 in gas and food. To go on the trip, they must miss two work shifts, where they would have earned $80 per shift. Last month, they paid a non-refundable $50 deposit for the trip. Based on a comparison of the benefits and the full costs of the decision, should the student go on the trip, and why?
Learn After
Weekend Activity Decision
Alex is considering buying a new video game. He values the enjoyment of playing the game at $60. The game costs $40. If he doesn't buy the game, his next best alternative is to work an extra shift at his job, which would earn him $15. According to the principle of comparing benefits and economic costs, what is the rational choice for Alex?
Rational Decision for a Weekend Trip
An individual is considering attending a special one-time workshop. The ticket for the workshop costs $75. If they do not attend, their next best alternative is to work a part-time shift, where they would earn $50. To make attending the workshop an economically rational choice, the personal value or benefit they place on the experience must be, at a minimum, greater than what amount?
An individual is deciding whether to attend a 3-hour seminar. The ticket for the seminar costs $40. If they do not attend, their only other alternative is to work a shift at their part-time job, where they earn $25 per hour. The individual values the knowledge and experience from the seminar at $120. What is the net economic surplus from attending the seminar, and based on this, is it a rational choice?
An individual is deciding whether to spend two hours at a local festival. The entrance fee is $10. They value the experience of the festival at $40. If they did not go to the festival, they would have spent those two hours working, earning $15 per hour. The individual reasons that since the $40 benefit is greater than the $10 entrance fee, it is a rational decision to go. This reasoning is correct.
Evaluating a Weekend Decision
Decision with a Prior Commitment
A student is deciding how to spend their Friday evening. They have three mutually exclusive options:
- Attend a basketball game: The ticket costs $20, and they value the experience at $70.
- Work a shift: They could earn $60.
- Study for an exam: They value this activity at $40.
Based on an evaluation of benefits versus economic costs, what is the economic cost of attending the basketball game, and is it a rational choice?
Analyzing a Flawed Decision
An individual is considering attending a special one-time workshop. The ticket for the workshop costs $75. If they do not attend, their next best alternative is to work a part-time shift, where they would earn $50. To make attending the workshop an economically rational choice, the personal value or benefit they place on the experience must be, at a minimum, greater than what amount?
Rational Decision for a Weekend Trip