Assessing Economic Output with Quality Changes
A country's national statistics office is calculating its economic output. It observes that in the mobile phone sector, 10 million units were sold last year at an average price of $500, and 10 million units were sold this year at an average price of $500. Based solely on this price and quantity data, the office concludes there was no change in the economic output from this sector. However, a separate technology analysis reveals that this year's phones have 50% more processing power and a significantly improved camera compared to last year's models. Explain why the statistics office's initial conclusion is likely misleading and what adjustment should be considered.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Macroeconomics Course
Ch.3 Aggregate demand and the multiplier model - The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
An economy produces only one product: a smartphone. In Year 1, it sells 1 million units for $500 each. In Year 2, it sells 1 million units for $520 each. The smartphones produced in Year 2 are substantially more powerful and have more features than the ones from Year 1. If a statistician calculates economic growth by looking only at the total revenue change and does not adjust for the quality improvements, what will be the most likely outcome for the economic data?
Assessing Economic Output with Quality Changes
Comparing National Accounting Methods for Technology Goods
An economist observes that the average selling price of a new mobile phone was $600 in both Year 1 and Year 2. Based on this information alone, the economist concludes that the mobile phone sector made no contribution to the change in the nation's real economic output between the two years. This conclusion is correct.