Case Study

Based on the provided research design, explain why the researcher cannot confidently conclude that the new teaching method directly caused any observed differences in the classes' final knowledge of fractions.

Case context: An educational researcher investigates a new fraction teaching method. They apply the new method to one existing class of third-grade students (the treatment group) and use the standard method in another existing class of third-grade students (the control group). At the end of the term, they compare the two classes' knowledge of fractions.

Question: Based on the provided research design, explain why the researcher cannot confidently conclude that the new teaching method directly caused any observed differences in the classes' final knowledge of fractions.

Sample answer: Because the researcher used a nonequivalent control group and did not randomly assign the third-grade students to the two classes, pre-existing differences may exist between them. Any differences in posttest fraction knowledge might have been caused by the new teaching method, but they could equally be the result of these pre-existing confounding variables.

Key points:

  • The study uses a nonequivalent groups design without random assignment.
  • Inherent differences likely existed between the two intact classes from the start.
  • Observed posttest differences could be caused by the new teaching method.
  • Observed posttest differences could equally result from pre-existing confounding variables.

Rubric: Full credit is given if the learner explains that the lack of random assignment leaves open the possibility that pre-existing confounding variables, rather than the treatment itself, caused the observed differences in posttest outcomes.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related