Learn Before
Compare these two research scenarios. Explain why one is ethically acceptable under the guidelines of disguised naturalistic observation while the other is not, demonstrating your understanding of the interaction between anonymity and expectations of privacy.
Case context: A researcher is studying littering behavior. They set up a hidden camera in a public park's communal picnic shelter. They record everyone who uses the shelter, plans to keep all participants anonymous in their dataset, and will delete the video recordings after coding the behavior. Another researcher wants to set up a hidden camera inside the changing stalls of a public beach house to observe whether people hang up their wet swimsuits or leave them on the floor, also keeping everyone anonymous.
Question: Compare these two research scenarios. Explain why one is ethically acceptable under the guidelines of disguised naturalistic observation while the other is not, demonstrating your understanding of the interaction between anonymity and expectations of privacy.
Sample answer: The picnic shelter study is ethically acceptable because it takes place in a public area where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and anonymity is maintained. The beach house changing stall study is unethical because, despite keeping participants anonymous, individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy inside a changing stall. Disguised naturalistic observation requires both anonymity and a setting lacking a reasonable expectation of privacy to be ethically sound.
Key points:
- Both anonymity and a lack of privacy expectation must be met for the study to be ethical.
- The public picnic shelter is a public space where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
- The changing stall is a setting with a reasonable expectation of privacy, making secret observation unethical.
- Anonymity does not justify observation in private spaces.
Rubric: The response must demonstrate comprehension by identifying that anonymity alone is not enough. It must explain that the picnic shelter lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy (acceptable), whereas the changing stall has a reasonable expectation of privacy (unacceptable).
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
According to ethical guidelines, under which primary conditions is disguised naturalistic observation generally considered acceptable?
Match each scenario of disguised naturalistic observation with the ethical rationale that best describes its status according to psychological research standards.
A researcher secretly records the interactions of students working inside a private study room at a public university library. True or False: This study is ethically acceptable for disguised naturalistic observation because the library is a public building.
Arrange the following evaluative steps in the logical order a researcher must follow to determine the ethical feasibility of a disguised naturalistic observation study, moving from the broad environmental context to the protection of individual data.
A researcher is developing a study to investigate how individuals in a metropolitan area respond to a staged 'lost' wallet. To maintain the study's ecological validity, the researcher must ensure that participants are unaware they are being watched. Construct the most ethically robust research protocol for this study that allows for secret observation while adhering to the primary ethical requirements for this methodology.
True or False: According to psychological research ethics, disguised naturalistic observation is automatically considered ethically sound as long as the setting is public, regardless of whether the individuals in that space have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
A researcher evaluates a study where they secretly record behavior in a public gym's locker room. The researcher argues that because the building is public, the study is ethically permissible. This evaluation is flawed because it ignores the fact that participants in that specific space still have a(n) _____ expectation of privacy.
In psychological research, conducting disguised naturalistic observation without consent is ethically permissible only if the participants remain anonymous and the setting is one where they do not have a reasonable expectation of _____.
A student is analyzing how four research scenarios and practices map onto the two ethical criteria for disguised naturalistic observation: (1) participant anonymity and (2) no reasonable expectation of privacy in the setting. Match each item with the ethical criterion it addresses and whether that criterion is satisfied or violated.
A researcher is constructing a written ethical justification for a proposed disguised naturalistic observation study. Arrange the following components in the order that produces the most logically defensible argument, from establishing the foundational ethical standard to issuing a reasoned final verdict.
State the two primary ethical conditions that must be met for disguised naturalistic observation to be considered ethically sound, and specify the two examples provided in the text to illustrate acceptable and unacceptable observation settings.
Compare these two research scenarios. Explain why one is ethically acceptable under the guidelines of disguised naturalistic observation while the other is not, demonstrating your understanding of the interaction between anonymity and expectations of privacy.
A researcher wants to study queue-jumping behavior by secretly videotaping customers waiting in line at an outdoor food truck festival. Apply the ethical guidelines for disguised naturalistic observation to determine if this study is ethically permissible, and justify your decision in one to three sentences.