Comparison

Comparison of Shepherd Allegories in Sanai and Attar

Hakim Sanai in Hadiqat al-Haqiqah and Farid al-Din Attar in Mosibat Nameh both utilize the allegory of the shepherd to instruct rulers on justice, yet they emphasize different moral dimensions. Sanai's allegory of Moses portrays shepherdhood as a necessary developmental trial; it is a period of cultivating patience and protective care that qualifies a leader to govern humanity. In contrast, Attar's allegory, directed at Sultan Sanjar, employs a shepherd-and-wolf motif as a stark warning against the exploitation of subjects. While Sanai focuses on the internal refinement of the ruler's character before assuming power, Attar emphasizes condemning the active oppression and greed of an already established ruler.

0

1

Updated 2026-07-04

Contributors are:

Who are from:

References


Tags

Humanities

Literature

Persian Literature Prerequisite Course