Assumptions of Constant and Self-Interested Preferences and Technology in the Angela-Bruno Model
A foundational set of assumptions for comparing the different institutional settings within the Angela-Bruno model is that key elements are held constant. These include the production technology Angela uses and the personal preferences of both Angela and Bruno. Furthermore, their preferences are assumed to be entirely self-interested, meaning each character is concerned only with their own personal gain, without regard for the other. This consistency allows the model to isolate and analyze the specific effects that different institutions and 'rules of the game' have on the outcomes.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Mathematically Deriving the Pareto Efficiency Curve for the Angela-Bruno Interaction
Improved Rights and Structural Power for Angela under New Legislation (Case 2)
Tenancy Contract in the Angela-Bruno Model
Sharecropping
Case 3 - Angela as an Employee with Democratic Rights
Figure 5.6 - Summary of Rules Across Different Cases
Assumptions of Constant and Self-Interested Preferences and Technology in the Angela-Bruno Model
Analysis of Institutional Rules and Economic Outcomes
Consider three different institutional settings for an interaction between a landowner and a farmer who works the land. Arrange these settings in order, from the one that gives the farmer the least bargaining power to the one that gives her the most.
Consider an economic interaction between a landowner who owns a farm and a farmer who works the land. Initially, the farmer's only alternative to working for the landowner is to survive on a very small plot of public land. A new law is passed that establishes a universal basic income grant for all citizens, which provides a higher standard of living than the public land. How does this new institutional rule most likely alter the final allocation of grain between the landowner and the farmer, assuming they reach a new agreement?
In an economic interaction between a landowner and a farmer, if the final agreed-upon distribution of the harvest is highly unequal, with the landowner receiving the vast majority of the output, this outcome is only possible if the landowner has the power to use physical force against the farmer.
Impact of Collective Bargaining on Allocations
The Link Between Institutional Rules and Economic Outcomes
Match each institutional scenario describing the rules of interaction between a landowner and a farmer with the most likely resulting economic outcome.
Consider an interaction where a landowner proposes a contract to a farmer to work his land. The total amount of grain produced depends on the hours the farmer works. Initially, the farmer's only alternative to accepting the contract is to receive a small government ration that guarantees her survival. A new law is then passed, which gives the farmer the right to refuse the contract and instead work her own small plot of land, which provides her with more grain than the government ration but less than she could get from a favorable contract with the landowner.
How does this change in the institutional setting affect the set of possible agreements between the farmer and the landowner?
An economist observes an interaction between a landowner and a landless farmer. The farmer works long hours and receives only enough grain to survive, while the landowner receives a large surplus. The economist concludes: 'This outcome is inherently inefficient because the distribution is so unequal.' Which of the following provides the most accurate critique of the economist's conclusion?
An economic interaction between a landowner and a farmer results in the farmer receiving a share of the harvest that is significantly above her biological survival needs but less than half of the total output. Which of the following institutional frameworks is the least plausible explanation for this specific outcome?
Framework for Comparing Outcomes Across Different Institutional Settings
Case 1: Forced Labor under Coercion
Welfare Comparison Across Angela-Bruno Scenarios (Baseline, Case 1, and Case 2)
Baseline Case: Angela's Optimal Choice as an Independent Farmer
Learn After
The Role of Assumptions in Economic Models
An economist builds a model to compare a worker's productivity under two different payment contracts. Contract A is used in the first period, and Contract B is used in the second period. The economist observes that the worker's output is significantly higher in the second period and concludes that Contract B provides a better incentive structure. Which of the following scenarios, if it also occurred, would most seriously undermine the economist's conclusion?
Evaluating the 'Self-Interest' Assumption in Economic Models
The Importance of Constant Assumptions in Economic Models
When using an economic model to determine which of two different institutional arrangements leads to a better outcome, it is methodologically sound to assume that the individuals involved become more skilled and productive between the first and second scenarios.
An economist wants to isolate the effect of a single change in a rule or contract on an economic outcome. To do this, other key factors must be assumed to remain the same. Match each of the following experimental scenarios with the specific assumption that has been violated, thereby making the economist's conclusion unreliable.
An economist is comparing two different 'rules of the game' for how two individuals divide their joint output. The first set of rules is used in Period 1, and a new set of rules is introduced in Period 2. The economist observes that total output is higher in Period 2. During Period 2, one of the individuals also develops a new skill that makes them personally more productive. Given this information, the economist can confidently attribute the entire increase in output to the new rules.
Evaluating a Policy Impact Study
An agricultural economist wants to test if a new farming technique increases crop yield on a specific plot of land. The study compares the yield from last year (using the old technique) with the yield from this year (using the new technique). To ensure that any change in yield can be correctly attributed to the new technique, which of the following factors would be the LEAST critical to assume has remained constant between the two years?
Evaluating a Company's New Incentive Plan