Infeasibility of an Entire Indifference Curve
An entire indifference curve is considered infeasible if all the combinations of goods it represents lie outside the consumer's feasible set. This situation occurs when the utility level associated with the curve is so high that it cannot be achieved with the available resources or constraints. For instance, in Figure 3.7a, the indifference curve IC4 is entirely outside Karim's feasible set, making all points on it unattainable for him.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.3 Doing the best you can: Scarcity, wellbeing, and working hours - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Infeasibility of an Entire Indifference Curve
Activity: Identifying Karim's Optimal Choice on the Feasible Frontier
Point (21, 90) as a Suboptimal Choice on the Feasible Frontier
Suboptimality of Intersection Points ('Could Do Better' Scenarios)
Feasible Frontier in Figure 3.7a
Point C (15.5, 255) as a Feasible but Suboptimal Choice
Figure 3.7b - MRS and MRT Values
Varying Preferences and Choices Under Identical Constraints
Point B (9.5, 435) as an Intersection on IC1
Point D (12, 360) as an Intersection on IC2
Activity: Evaluating Statements Based on Figure 3.7a
Karim's Optimal Choice at Point E (17, 210): The Balance of MRS and MRT
Incentive to Decrease Free Time when MRT > MRS
Learn After
Figure 4.11 (reproduced as E4.1) - Zoë's Optimal Altruistic Choice
A consumer has a fixed weekly income to spend on two goods: digital books and movie streaming subscriptions. The consumer has identified their optimal consumption bundle, which provides the highest level of satisfaction possible given their income. They then imagine a different, more desirable combination of goods. This new combination lies on an indifference curve where every point represents a higher level of satisfaction than their current optimal bundle. However, they realize they cannot afford any of the combinations on this new, higher indifference curve. What is the fundamental economic reason for this situation?
Evaluating Consumer Choices
Interpreting Consumer Possibilities
Consider a consumer's choices between two goods. If a specific bundle of goods, Bundle X, is located on an indifference curve where every single combination is beyond the consumer's budget, then it is impossible for the consumer to afford any other bundle that they would strictly prefer to Bundle X.
Imagine a standard consumer choice diagram for two goods, where a downward-sloping line represents the limit of affordable consumption bundles. A set of indifference curves (IC₁, IC₂, IC₃, and IC₄) are plotted on this diagram, each representing a different level of satisfaction. Their positions relative to the limit are as follows:
- IC₁ is located entirely within the affordable area, not touching the limit line.
- IC₂ intersects the limit line at two distinct points.
- IC₃ touches the limit line at exactly one point.
- IC₄ is located entirely outside the affordable area, not touching the limit line at any point.
Based on this information, which indifference curve represents a level of satisfaction that is completely impossible for the consumer to achieve?
Analyzing Consumer Constraints
Relevance of Unattainable Consumption
A consumer makes choices between two goods, subject to a budget constraint represented by a line on a graph. The consumer's preferences are shown by a series of indifference curves. Match the description of each indifference curve's position relative to the budget constraint line with the correct economic classification of the consumption bundles on that curve.
Overcoming Consumer Constraints
A consumer has a desired consumption bundle of goods that would provide a very high level of satisfaction. However, this specific bundle is currently unaffordable given their income and the prices of the goods. Further analysis reveals that no possible adjustment to the consumer's spending can achieve this specific level of satisfaction. What can be concluded about every other combination of goods that would provide this same high level of satisfaction?