COVID-19 Public Sentiment Insights and Machine Learning for Tweets Classification
- There has been mass fear and panic phenomena due to incomplete and often inaccurate information.
- There is a need to address and better understand COVID-19's informational crisis and gauge public sentiment, so that appropriate messaging and policy decisions can be implemented.
- In the article, "COVID-19 Public Sentiment Insights and Machine Learning for Tweets Classification" by Jim Samuel research article, public sentiment associated with the pandemic using Coronavirus specific Tweets and R statistical software, along with its sentiment analysis packages are identified.
- There have been insights into the progress of fear-sentiment over time as COVID-19 approached peak levels in the United States. The article uses descriptive textual analytics supported by necessary textual data visualizations.
- Furthermore, the article shows a methodological overview of two essential machine learning classification methods, in the context of textual analytics, and compares their effectiveness in classifying Coronavirus Tweets of varying lengths.
- Samuel observes a strong classification accuracy of 91% for short Tweets, with the Naive Bayes method.
- There is also an observation made that the logistic regression classification method provides a reasonable accuracy of 74% with shorter Tweets, and both methods showed relatively weaker performance for longer Tweets.
- The research provides insights into Coronavirus fear sentiment progression, and outlines associated methods, implications, limitations and opportunities.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Ben Hammeer expresses how Kaggle helps COVID researchers
Nature tweets about a new article about AI summarizing papers to help COVID researchers sift through literature
Vaughn Cooper tweets about a COVID registry by ASMicrobiology
Connected Papers tweets about the launch of their new product, a visual tool to help scientists find relevant papers
Axios posts about AI solutions to the flood of information related to COVID research
Raleigh M. Linville tweets useful browser extensions that help improve literature searches
Rens van de Schoot tweets about new version of plugin that uses active learning to produce recent and relevant COVID-19 papers
DiscourseNet posts webinar that allows scientists to get their COVID papers (between 1000-3000 words) reviewed by a group of peers.
Bianca Kramer posts that Elsevier's COVID related content will remain free until October
Jeorg Heber tweets that he will be working with other publishers to properly review COVID papers
Salesforce tweets their new search tool for relevant COVID-19 papers
COVID-19 Public Sentiment Insights and Machine Learning for Tweets Classification
Geoffrey Siwo tweets about crowdsourced COVID-19 gene library that helps reach consensus
Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus tweets about on a new COVID-19 data platform, Pool, that will be open to everybody to work on the solution
Tim Plante tweets his solution on how he helped others template their scientific papers
Jen Oyler-Yaniv tweets about coming together with researchers from other universities to learn