Learn Before
Define what an edited volume is within scholarly literature and describe its typical organizational structure, highlighting the role of the editorial team and how the individual chapters relate to one another.
Question: Define what an edited volume is within scholarly literature and describe its typical organizational structure, highlighting the role of the editorial team and how the individual chapters relate to one another.
Sample answer: An edited volume is a scholarly book in which an editor or editorial team recruits various authors to write separate chapters on different aspects of a shared topic. While the volume aims to provide a coherent overview, the individual chapters may present distinct perspectives, and the authors of different chapters may openly disagree with one another.
Key points:
- Edited volumes are scholarly books.
- An editor or editorial team recruits various authors.
- Authors write separate chapters on different aspects of a shared topic.
- Individual chapters may present distinct perspectives.
- Authors of different chapters may openly disagree with one another.
Rubric: To receive full credit, the response must state that edited volumes are scholarly books, identify the role of the editor or editorial team in recruiting authors, explain that separate chapters are written on different aspects of a shared topic, and explain that chapters may feature distinct perspectives or open disagreement.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Which of the following best describes an edited volume in the context of scholarly literature?
A student reading an edited volume on memory research should expect all the included chapters to present unified findings that agree with one another.
A group of psychologists is collaborating on a new book titled 'The Nature of Intelligence.' Match the following descriptions of the book's development to the corresponding characteristic of an edited volume.
A student is analyzing a scholarly book titled The Neurobiology of Addiction. To understand its structural organization as an edited volume, arrange these components in order from the broadest level of organizational oversight to the most specific expression of an individual scholarly perspective.
You are designing a proposal for a new scholarly book titled 'The Evolution of Cognitive Therapy'. Which of the following project designs would you implement to successfully create an edited volume?
Match each role or term to its corresponding characteristic based on the standard structure and definition of edited volumes.
A researcher evaluating the coherence of a scholarly book notes that while it covers a shared topic, several chapters explicitly contradict each other. This researcher should recognize that this lack of consensus is a hallmark of a(n) _____, rather than a sign of poor editorial oversight.
A psychology student needs a scholarly source that covers multiple competing theoretical perspectives on personality development, including viewpoints that may openly contradict one another. Selecting an edited volume to fulfill this research goal would be appropriate.
Dr. Okafor is overseeing a scholarly book on emotion regulation: she coordinates the project, determines the book's thematic scope, and recruits specialists to each contribute an independent chapter. Dr. Patel, one of the recruited specialists, writes only the chapter on cognitive reappraisal strategies. Based on the structural characteristics of an edited volume, Dr. Okafor's role is best described as the _____ of the book.
A research methods student is deciding whether a chapter from a scholarly book on attachment theory is appropriate to cite in their literature review. Arrange the following evaluative steps in the most logical order, from initial identification to final citation decision.
Define what an edited volume is within scholarly literature and describe its typical organizational structure, highlighting the role of the editorial team and how the individual chapters relate to one another.
Diagnose the specific format of this scholarly book. Explain how the book's structure allows for these conflicting viewpoints to coexist within the same published work.
If you are invited to contribute a chapter to a newly proposed scholarly book on anxiety disorders structured as an edited volume, how will your work be organized alongside other contributors' work, and what level of theoretical agreement should you expect among the chapters?