Learn Before
Diagnose the specific format of this scholarly book. Explain how the book's structure allows for these conflicting viewpoints to coexist within the same published work.
Case context: A student is reading a scholarly book about childhood development. The front cover lists two prominent psychologists as the editorial team. However, each chapter is written by different researchers. While reading, the student notices that Chapter 2 advocates for a biological explanation of development, whereas Chapter 4 strongly advocates for a behavioral explanation, representing an open disagreement between the authors.
Question: Diagnose the specific format of this scholarly book. Explain how the book's structure allows for these conflicting viewpoints to coexist within the same published work.
Sample answer: This scholarly book is an edited volume. In this format, an editorial team recruits different authors to write separate chapters on different aspects of a shared topic. Although edited volumes aim to provide a coherent overview of the topic, it is normal and expected for individual chapters to present distinct perspectives or even feature authors who openly disagree with one another.
Key points:
- The book format is diagnosed as an edited volume.
- An editorial team recruits various authors to write separate chapters.
- Each chapter covers a different aspect of the shared topic.
- The format aims to provide a coherent overview.
- Distinct perspectives or open disagreement between chapter authors is normal and expected.
Rubric: The response must identify the book as an edited volume and explain that its structure involves different authors contributing separate chapters on a shared topic under an editorial team, which inherently allows for distinct perspectives and open disagreement.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Which of the following best describes an edited volume in the context of scholarly literature?
A student reading an edited volume on memory research should expect all the included chapters to present unified findings that agree with one another.
A group of psychologists is collaborating on a new book titled 'The Nature of Intelligence.' Match the following descriptions of the book's development to the corresponding characteristic of an edited volume.
A student is analyzing a scholarly book titled The Neurobiology of Addiction. To understand its structural organization as an edited volume, arrange these components in order from the broadest level of organizational oversight to the most specific expression of an individual scholarly perspective.
You are designing a proposal for a new scholarly book titled 'The Evolution of Cognitive Therapy'. Which of the following project designs would you implement to successfully create an edited volume?
Match each role or term to its corresponding characteristic based on the standard structure and definition of edited volumes.
A researcher evaluating the coherence of a scholarly book notes that while it covers a shared topic, several chapters explicitly contradict each other. This researcher should recognize that this lack of consensus is a hallmark of a(n) _____, rather than a sign of poor editorial oversight.
A psychology student needs a scholarly source that covers multiple competing theoretical perspectives on personality development, including viewpoints that may openly contradict one another. Selecting an edited volume to fulfill this research goal would be appropriate.
Dr. Okafor is overseeing a scholarly book on emotion regulation: she coordinates the project, determines the book's thematic scope, and recruits specialists to each contribute an independent chapter. Dr. Patel, one of the recruited specialists, writes only the chapter on cognitive reappraisal strategies. Based on the structural characteristics of an edited volume, Dr. Okafor's role is best described as the _____ of the book.
A research methods student is deciding whether a chapter from a scholarly book on attachment theory is appropriate to cite in their literature review. Arrange the following evaluative steps in the most logical order, from initial identification to final citation decision.
Define what an edited volume is within scholarly literature and describe its typical organizational structure, highlighting the role of the editorial team and how the individual chapters relate to one another.
Diagnose the specific format of this scholarly book. Explain how the book's structure allows for these conflicting viewpoints to coexist within the same published work.
If you are invited to contribute a chapter to a newly proposed scholarly book on anxiety disorders structured as an edited volume, how will your work be organized alongside other contributors' work, and what level of theoretical agreement should you expect among the chapters?