Learn Before
Describe Diana Baumrind's specific ethical criticism of Stanley Milgram's obedience research regarding his handling of participants' reactions. According to Baumrind, what should Milgram have done once the first few participants showed severe negative reactions?
Question: Describe Diana Baumrind's specific ethical criticism of Stanley Milgram's obedience research regarding his handling of participants' reactions. According to Baumrind, what should Milgram have done once the first few participants showed severe negative reactions?
Sample answer: Diana Baumrind criticized Stanley Milgram's obedience research for its lack of ethical follow-through. She argued that while Milgram could not have known in advance that participants would experience such severe negative reactions, he observed their distress after testing the first few subjects. According to Baumrind, Milgram should have monitored these unanticipated reactions and ethically adjusted his research procedures at that point.
Key points:
- Milgram's research lacked ethical follow-through.
- Milgram could not have anticipated the severe reactions beforehand.
- Milgram observed the distress after testing the first few subjects.
- Milgram should have monitored reactions and ethically adjusted his procedures at that point.
Rubric: To receive full credit, the response must accurately recall that: (1) Baumrind criticized Milgram's lack of ethical follow-through, (2) she acknowledged he could not have known the severity of reactions in advance, (3) he did observe distress after testing the first few subjects, and (4) she argued he should have monitored these unanticipated reactions and ethically adjusted his procedures.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
What was Diana Baumrind's primary ethical criticism regarding Stanley Milgram's obedience research?
Match each component of Diana Baumrind’s ethical critique with the specific argument she made regarding Stanley Milgram’s obedience research.
A researcher is conducting a study on social influence. After testing the first few participants, they observe that the subjects are experiencing extreme and unexpected psychological distress. According to Diana Baumrind’s critique of the Milgram study, the researcher is ethically justified in continuing the study as designed because the distress was not predicted beforehand.
Diana Baumrind’s critique of the Milgram obedience study focuses on the specific point at which a researcher’s ignorance of potential harm turns into a failure of ethical oversight. Arrange the following stages to reconstruct the logical progression of Baumrind’s argument regarding the onset of this ethical failure.
You are developing a research protocol for a new laboratory experiment that involves psychological stress. To construct a study design that specifically addresses the ethical 'lack of follow-through' Diana Baumrind identified in the Milgram obedience experiments, which procedural feature should you implement?
According to Diana Baumrind's critique, Milgram should have been able to predict before his study began that participants would experience severe psychological distress, and this failure of foresight is the central basis of her ethical objection.
In her evaluation of the Milgram study, Diana Baumrind argues that the researcher's ethical status became compromised the moment he failed to _____ his procedures after observing the unanticipated psychological distress of the first few participants.
A researcher is applying Baumrind's framework for evaluating ethical follow-through in studies with unanticipated participant reactions. Match each researcher action to the ethical status it would receive under Baumrind's criteria.
Baumrind's critique identifies two structurally distinct phases in Milgram's research: a phase before any participants were tested, during which no evidence of severe distress existed and Milgram's conduct was arguably not yet culpable, and a phase after the first several participants were tested, during which continued use of the same unmodified protocol represented a failure of ethical _____.
An IRB panel is conducting a retrospective ethical review of a completed study by applying Baumrind's standard for monitoring and adjusting for unanticipated participant reactions. Place the following steps of the panel's evaluation in the correct logical order.
Describe Diana Baumrind's specific ethical criticism of Stanley Milgram's obedience research regarding his handling of participants' reactions. According to Baumrind, what should Milgram have done once the first few participants showed severe negative reactions?
Based on Diana Baumrind's critique of Milgram's study, explain how the researcher should handle the unexpected distress of these initial participants and explain the underlying ethical principle of monitoring unanticipated reactions.
Imagine you are designing a psychological experiment on cognitive pressure and want to incorporate Baumrind's ethical recommendation for unanticipated participant distress. What specific action should you plan to take if the first group of participants shows unexpected, severe negative reactions?