DP adopts a post-cognitive or anti-cognitivist position, rejecting direct access to an individual's mind. Instead, it assumes people's memories, beliefs, and psychological states are always interactionally achieved through language use. This challenges traditional cognitivist orientations that identify mental states as internal, isolated systems. DP reframes psychological matters as always visible in language rather than hidden mental processes.

Post-Cognitive Stance in Psychology

CDP extends traditional DP by combining macro- and micro-discourse approaches with more critical and post-structural perspectives. It examines how discourse acts as social practice with practical consequences for mental life and social positioning. CDP incorporates broader social critique while maintaining DP's empirical focus on language-in-use. This variation pushes DP toward more explicitly political analysis.

Critical Discursive Psychology

DS emerged as an interdisciplinary field rejecting deficit-driven ideologies and advocating for full societal inclusion of disabled people. Rooted in poststructuralism and postmodernism, it emphasizes activism and social/political transformation rather than medical intervention. The field privileges voices of disabled people and examines disability as socio-political-cultural phenomenon. DS challenges traditional academic approaches that pathologize difference.

Framework for Disability Studies

- Post-Cognitive Stance in Psychology
- Critical Discursive Psychology
- Disability Studies Framework

State University of New York at Binghamton

Chapter 1 sets the stage for understanding Discursive Psychology (DP) as a rigorous, qualitative methodology that scrutinizes language and interaction to reveal how disability is not a static medical condition, but a fluid, socially constructed phenomenon.

Chapter 1: Introducing Discursive Psychology as Methodology to Understand Disability

Lester, J. N. (Ed.). (2021). Discursive Psychology and Disability. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Reference For: Discursive Psychology and Disability

- Disability as Biological vs. Cultural Construction
- Materialist Social Model
- Reification Critique
- Medicalization Processes

Challenging Traditional Disability Constructions

- DP as Empirical Tool for Real-Time Analysis
- Naturally-Occurring Data Preference
- Detailed Transcription Systems
- Conversation Analysis Influence
- Unmotivated Looking
- Next Turn Proof Procedure

Discursive Psychology (DP)'s Methodological Contributions

- Language as Action-Oriented Practice
- Constructed Nature of Discourse
- Situated Context of All Discourse
- Discursive Action Model (DAM)

Discursive Psychology (DP): Discourse as Social Action

- Extreme Case Formulations
- Interpretative Repertoires
- Ideological Dilemmas
- Subject Positions
- Multimodal Communication

Analytical Tools and Concepts in Discursive Psychology

DP's Theoretical Foundations

The volume explicitly aims to bridge disciplinary gaps between DP and Disability Studies by generating intersectional scholarship. It seeks originality and renewal by combining insights from both fields through productive dialogue. The inclusion of DS scholar responses demonstrates commitment to rich, productive engagement across disciplines. This approach positions DP as providing concrete empirical evidence to inform disability debates.

Learn Before

Related

Learn After