Effectiveness and Purpose of Advertising in the Breakfast Cereal Market (Shum, 2004)
Based on an analysis of the Chicago breakfast cereal market, economist Matthew Shum determined that advertising was more effective at stimulating consumer demand for a brand than offering price discounts. [2, 3] His research concluded that the main function of advertising for well-known brands was not to inform new customers, but rather to build brand loyalty and persuade consumers to switch from competing products. [1, 2]
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.7 The firm and its customers - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Learn After
A long-standing, popular breakfast cereal brand has seen its sales dip slightly due to increased competition. The company's management team is debating how to respond. Based on findings about the primary purpose and effectiveness of marketing for well-established brands in this specific product category, which of the following strategies is most likely to be successful?
Evaluating a Cereal Brand's Marketing Strategy
Based on economic research into the breakfast cereal market, a well-established brand would likely find that a significant price reduction is a more effective strategy for stimulating consumer demand than a comparable increase in advertising.
Analyzing Advertising Strategy in the Cereal Market
Advertising's Role for Established Brands
Based on economic research regarding the breakfast cereal market, match each described marketing strategy with its most likely primary purpose or outcome for an established brand.
According to economic analysis of the breakfast cereal market, the primary function of advertising for well-known brands is not to inform new customers, but rather to foster ______ and encourage consumers to switch from competing products.
Evaluating Marketing Strategies for an Established Cereal Brand
A well-established breakfast cereal brand, 'GrainLife,' noticed that a 20% price reduction for three months did not lead to a significant increase in its market share. During the same period, a primary competitor, 'OatMunch,' launched a major advertising campaign and 'GrainLife' saw a slight decrease in its sales. Based on economic research regarding this specific market, what is the most likely explanation for this outcome?
Evaluating Competing Marketing Proposals for a Cereal Brand