Evaluating a Claim about a Universal Income Program
A politician argues against a proposed universal income program, which would provide every citizen with a fixed monthly payment regardless of their work status. The politician claims, "This program will be an economic disaster because it will cause a massive reduction in the country's labor supply. If you pay people not to work, they will simply choose to work less." Based on your understanding of how individuals make choices between consumption and leisure, critically evaluate the politician's claim. Is it certain that everyone will work less? Explain your reasoning.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.3 Doing the best you can: Scarcity, wellbeing, and working hours - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Quasi-linear Preferences
Two individuals, Alex and Ben, work at the same hourly wage. They each receive a significant, one-time financial windfall that is independent of their work hours. In response, Alex reduces the number of hours he works each week, while Ben continues to work the same number of hours as before. Both individuals increase their overall consumption of goods and services. What is the most accurate economic explanation for this difference in their choices?
The Lottery Winner's Dilemma
Explaining Different Labor-Leisure Choices
Analyzing Responses to a Government Stipend
Three individuals with different priorities each receive a large, one-time payment that is not related to their work. This payment increases their ability to afford both goods and leisure time. Match the description of each individual's preferences with their most likely behavioral response to this new income.
If an individual's budget constraint shifts outward due to an increase in income that is unrelated to their work, they will always choose to work fewer hours because they can now afford more leisure time.
Two individuals, Maya and Liam, earn the same hourly wage. They both begin receiving a daily government stipend that is independent of the hours they work. In response, Maya chooses to work fewer hours and increase her consumption of goods. Liam chooses to work the same number of hours as before, but uses the entire stipend to increase his consumption of goods. What does this difference in behavior reveal about their underlying preferences?
Interpreting a Labor-Leisure Choice
An individual's budget is determined by their hourly wage and the number of hours they choose to work. This relationship can be graphed with 'Hours of Leisure per day' on the horizontal axis and 'Consumption ($)' on the vertical axis. The individual then starts receiving a fixed, daily, non-work-related income supplement. In response, they decide to work fewer hours and also increase their daily consumption. Which of the following descriptions accurately represents this change on the graph?
Evaluating a Claim about a Universal Income Program
Analyzing Responses to a Government Stipend