Case Study

Evaluating a Public Policy Model

A city government is considering a new policy to provide a monthly cash subsidy to low-income households. An economic model used by the city's analysts predicts this policy will increase the consumption of all basic goods and services, including staple foods like bread and rice, and services like public transportation. The model is built on the standard assumption that as an individual's purchasing power grows, they will choose to consume more, or at least not less, of a valued good.

A community advocate challenges the model's prediction. They argue that with the extra income, many families might buy less public transportation tickets because they can now afford to use ride-sharing services more often. They also suggest families might buy less of the cheapest brand of rice, opting for a more expensive, higher-quality variety instead.

Critically evaluate the city's model in light of the advocate's claims. Is the model's underlying assumption necessarily flawed for general economic analysis? Justify your conclusion.

0

1

Updated 2025-08-03

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Science

Economy

CORE Econ

Social Science

Empirical Science

Economics

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Ch.3 Doing the best you can: Scarcity, wellbeing, and working hours - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

Related