Essay

Evaluating Climate Change Communication Strategies

Imagine you are advising a public advocacy group on how to communicate the reality of human-caused climate change. You are presented with two primary strategies:

Strategy 1: The 'Consensus' Approach. This strategy's core message is: '97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming.' The campaign would feature scientists and respected figures repeating this fact.

Strategy 2: The 'Impacts' Approach. This strategy avoids mentioning the consensus statistic. Instead, it focuses on showing tangible evidence and personal stories related to climate impacts, such as farmers dealing with drought, coastal communities facing rising sea levels, and data visualizations of temperature increases.

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, specifically in the context of combating disinformation that seeks to create a false impression of scientific debate. Which strategy would you recommend as the primary approach, and why? Your answer should explain how a purveyor of disinformation might attempt to undermine each strategy.

0

1

Updated 2025-07-30

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Psychology

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

Economics

Economy

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

CORE Econ

Related