Jacobson, Lalonde, and Sullivan's Study on Displaced Worker Earnings During a Recession
A study by Louis Jacobson, Robert Lalonde, and Daniel Sullivan provides a key example of measuring the costs of job loss through a natural experiment. They analyzed experienced, full-time workers affected by mass layoffs in Pennsylvania in 1982, a period when the job market was particularly poor. Their findings showed a substantial and lasting financial impact. Workers who had earned an average of $50,000 in 1979 (in 2014 dollars) and found new employment within three months saw their earnings drop to an average of $35,000. This earnings gap persisted; four years later, these workers still earned $13,300 less than similar workers whose firms had not laid them off. The cumulative financial loss over the five years following the layoff was equivalent to an entire year's earnings. The study also highlighted that many of the displaced workers did not find any new work at all and consequently incurred even greater costs.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.6 The firm and its employees - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Jacobson, Lalonde, and Sullivan's Study on Displaced Worker Earnings During a Recession
Study on Employment Rents in Connecticut (1993-2004) During Favorable Economic Conditions
Evaluating Research Designs for Job Loss Impact
A researcher wants to estimate the average earnings lost when a worker becomes unemployed. They consider two study designs:
Study 1: Compare the average annual earnings of 1,000 randomly selected unemployed individuals to the average annual earnings of 1,000 randomly selected employed individuals in the same year.
Study 2: Track the annual earnings of all 500 workers from a local factory for three years before it unexpectedly closed and for three years after its closure.
Why is Study 2 likely to produce a more reliable estimate of the earnings cost of job loss than Study 1?
Evaluating Research Methods for Job Loss Costs
Critiquing Research Methods for Estimating Job Loss Costs
Critiquing Research Methods for Estimating Job Loss Costs
To accurately measure the financial cost of unemployment, a researcher should compare the average income of a group of workers who were laid off due to poor individual performance with the average income of workers who remained employed at the same company.
A labor economist wants to accurately estimate the typical earnings loss a worker experiences after becoming unemployed. Match each potential research design with its correct methodological evaluation.
When studying the financial impact of job loss, using a large-scale layoff where an entire plant is shut down is a method that helps researchers avoid a specific type of error. This error occurs when the group of unemployed individuals being studied is systematically different from the employed population (for example, they may be lower performers on average). This type of error is known as ______ bias.
A research team wants to estimate the earnings cost of job loss. They decide to study a large software company that announced it would be closing its main office in 18 months, affecting all 1,000 employees. The team plans to compare the earnings of these employees before the announcement to their earnings after the official closure. Which of the following statements identifies the most significant potential flaw in treating this specific scenario as a 'natural experiment'?
A researcher plans to use the sudden closure of a large manufacturing plant as a natural experiment to estimate the earnings cost of job loss. Arrange the following steps of their research process into the correct logical order.
Jacobson, Lalonde, and Sullivan's Study on Displaced Worker Earnings During a Recession
Prior to the early 1990s, many economic studies based on worker surveys suggested that the financial impact of involuntary job loss was often temporary. However, a landmark 1993 study using longitudinal administrative data from state unemployment insurance systems revealed that displaced workers experience large and persistent earnings losses. Which of the following best explains why the findings from the administrative data were so different from earlier survey-based results?
Evaluating Policy Arguments on Worker Displacement
Analyzing Long-Term Earnings After Displacement
Predicting Earnings Outcomes for Displaced Workers
According to the findings of a major 1993 study that used administrative data to track involuntarily displaced workers, the most significant earnings losses for these workers occur in the first year after displacement, after which their earnings typically recover to pre-displacement levels within three years.
A landmark 1993 study analyzed the long-term financial impact on workers who were involuntarily displaced from their jobs. Match each key concept from this study to its correct description.
A pivotal 1993 study on the financial consequences of involuntary job loss was able to demonstrate large and persistent earnings declines by using a novel data source for its time: longitudinal ______ data from state unemployment insurance systems, which provided a more comprehensive view than previous survey-based research.
A landmark 1993 study analyzed the earnings trajectory of workers after they were involuntarily displaced from stable jobs. Based on the typical pattern identified in that research, arrange the following phases of a displaced worker's earnings experience into the correct chronological order, starting from the period just before job loss.
Analysis of Persistent Earnings Loss
A landmark 1993 study sought to isolate the specific financial impact of involuntary job loss. To do this, researchers compared the earnings of displaced workers to a carefully selected comparison group. Which of the following groups would provide the most scientifically valid comparison to determine the earnings losses caused by displacement itself, rather than by broader economic trends?
Learn After
Costs of Job Loss for Re-employed vs. Unemployed Workers (Jacobson et al. Study)
A landmark study examined the earnings of experienced, full-time workers in Pennsylvania who lost their jobs due to mass layoffs during the 1982 recession. The study tracked these workers for several years. Based on the primary findings for workers who managed to find new employment, which statement best characterizes the relationship between the immediate and long-term financial impacts of their job displacement?
Analyzing Persistent Earnings Loss
Predicting Earnings Trajectory Post-Recession Layoff
Predicting Earnings Trajectory Post-Recession Layoff
Evaluating the Context of a Job Displacement Study
A prominent study analyzed the financial outcomes for experienced workers who lost their jobs in mass layoffs during a major 1982 recession in Pennsylvania. The study's main conclusion was that the primary financial cost of job loss was the income lost during the initial period of unemployment, with workers' earnings typically returning to their pre-layoff levels once they secured a new position.
A landmark study analyzed the long-term earnings of experienced workers who lost their jobs during a major recession in 1982. Match each element of the study's findings with its correct description.
A landmark study of experienced workers who lost their jobs in mass layoffs during the 1982 Pennsylvania recession found that the cumulative financial loss over the subsequent five years was equivalent to ____ pre-layoff earnings.
A 1993 study analyzed the earnings of experienced workers who lost their jobs in mass layoffs during a 1982 recession. Based on the study's findings, arrange the following scenarios in order from the highest average annual earnings to the lowest.
A landmark 1993 study on displaced workers in Pennsylvania specifically focused on individuals who lost their jobs due to mass layoffs, rather than those who were fired for individual performance reasons. Why was this methodological choice critical for accurately estimating the earnings losses caused by the economic event of job displacement?