Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Justifying High Living Costs
An example of cognitive dissonance is seen in the case of Maria and Marco, who choose to live in the affluent and expensive Fairfield County, Connecticut, despite the significant financial hardship it causes them. The conflict between their financial struggles (renting a small house for over $3000/month, having no money for new things) and their choice to remain in a high-cost area creates dissonance. They reduce this psychological discomfort by adding new cognitions that justify their decision, focusing on the area's beauty, their love for the beaches, and the sense of comfort they feel there. These positive beliefs serve to rationalize their financially challenging choice, making it seem worthwhile.
0
1
Tags
Ch.12 Social Psychology - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates cognitive dissonance?
Which of the following is an example of cognitive dissonance?
Which of the following situations demonstrates cognitive dissonance?
Which of the following scenarios is an example of cognitive dissonance?
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Smoking
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Military Boot Camp
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Justifying High Living Costs
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Smoking
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Military Boot Camp
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Justifying High Living Costs
An individual who prides themselves on being environmentally conscious experiences significant internal conflict after buying a new, expensive car with poor fuel efficiency. Which of the following thoughts best illustrates the strategy of adding a new cognition to reduce this discomfort?
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Smoking
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Military Boot Camp
Example of Cognitive Dissonance: Justifying High Living Costs
An individual is a vocal supporter of environmental conservation and believes people should minimize their carbon footprint. Despite this, they purchase a large, fuel-inefficient vehicle, which creates significant psychological discomfort. Which of the following statements represents a change in thought designed to reduce this discomfort?