Verifying Karim's Maximum Utility at t=17 using the Second Derivative Test
To confirm that Karim's choice of hours of free time is a maximum, the second derivative test is applied. The second derivative of his utility function with respect to is given by the formula . At the point , the value is $90(23 - 2 \times 17) = 90(23-34) = -990t=17$ corresponds to a point of maximum utility.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.3 Doing the best you can: Scarcity, wellbeing, and working hours - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Verifying Karim's Maximum Utility at t=17 using the Second Derivative Test
An individual has 24 hours available each day to allocate between free time and work. After analyzing their preferences and constraints, it is determined that their optimal amount of free time is 16 hours per day. If this individual earns a wage of $25 per hour, what is their optimal level of daily consumption?
Calculating Daily Consumption from Time Allocation
Calculating Optimal Daily Consumption
An individual allocates their 24-hour day between work and free time. Suppose this person's hourly wage increases, but their optimal choice of free time remains the same. In this scenario, their optimal daily consumption level will increase by the same percentage as their wage.
An individual has 24 hours per day to allocate between work and free time. Match each scenario of hourly wage and optimal free time to the corresponding optimal daily consumption level.
An individual has 24 hours per day to allocate between work and leisure. They earn an hourly wage of €25. If their optimal daily consumption level is €200, they must be choosing to have ____ hours of free time per day.
Error Analysis in Optimal Consumption Calculation
Evaluating the Relationship Between Wages, Free Time, and Consumption
An individual has 24 hours per day to allocate between work and free time. Initially, they earn €20 per hour and their optimal choice is to have 16 hours of free time. Later, their wage increases to €30 per hour, and they adjust their optimal choice to 19 hours of free time. How does their daily consumption level change as a result of these adjustments?
Evaluating Financial Advice on Consumption Choices
Karim's Optimal Choice at Point E (17, 210): The Balance of MRS and MRT
Learn After
Arrange the following events in the correct chronological and causal order to illustrate the shift in the textile trade between India and Britain from the early 18th to the mid-19th century.
A firm's profit is a function of its production level,
q. An analyst has identified a production level ofq = 20units as a point where profit is potentially optimized (i.e., the first derivative is zero). The second derivative of the profit function is given by the formulad²P/dq² = 100 - 6q. Based on this information, what can be concluded about the profit atq = 20?Optimizing Production Output
A marketing analyst is trying to determine the advertising budget (
A, in thousands of dollars) that maximizes a company's revenue. They identify a potential maximum atA = 30. The second derivative of the revenue function with respect to the advertising budget is given byd²R/dA² = 150 - 6A. The analyst concludes thatA = 30is indeed a point of maximum revenue.Confirming Optimal Fertilizer Use
An economist is analyzing a function to find its optimal points. They have already found the points where the first derivative is zero. Match the result of the second derivative test at one of these points with the correct conclusion about the function's value at that point.
An analyst is trying to find the production level that maximizes a company's profit. After finding a production level where the first derivative of the profit function is zero, they calculate the second derivative at that same point and get a value of -450. Because this value is ______, the analyst can confirm that the production level corresponds to a local profit maximum.
The Role of the Second Derivative in Confirming Optimal Choices
An economics student is analyzing a model to find the number of hours (
h) per day that maximizes a person's well-being. They've identifiedh = 8as a potential optimum. To verify if it's a maximum, they use the second derivative test. The second derivative of the well-being function is given byd²W/dh² = 20(15 - 2h).The student's analysis is as follows:
- Substitute
h = 8into the formula:20(15 - 2 * 8). - Calculate the result:
20(15 - 16) = 20(-1) = -20. - Conclusion: Since the result is a negative number,
h = 8corresponds to a point of minimum well-being.
Which part of the student's analysis is flawed?
- Substitute
Evaluating a Pricing Strategy
A marketing analyst is trying to determine the advertising budget (
A, in thousands of dollars) that maximizes a company's revenue. They identify a potential maximum atA = 30. The second derivative of the revenue function with respect to the advertising budget is given byd²R/dA² = 150 - 6A. The analyst concludes thatA = 30is indeed a point of maximum revenue.