Explain the relationship between dev set size and the ability to detect minor accuracy improvements, citing common size ranges.
Question: Analyze why a machine learning team might choose a dev set size between 1,000 and 10,000 examples, and discuss the specific utility of having 10,000 examples when evaluating minor performance changes such as a 0.1% improvement.
Sample answer: Dev sets commonly range from 1,000 to 10,000 examples in practice. Choosing a size within this range depends on the precision of the improvements the team needs to detect. If a team wants to detect small performance improvements, such as a 0.1% change, a larger dev set of 10,000 examples is highly recommended. With 10,000 examples, the statistical variance is small enough to reliably distinguish a genuine 0.1% improvement (which corresponds to 10 examples changing) from random noise, whereas a smaller dev set of 1,000 examples may not provide enough confidence because a 0.1% change is only a single example.
Key points:
- Dev sets with sizes from 1,000 to 10,000 examples are common.
- Detecting small model improvements requires larger dev set sizes to reduce variance.
- A dev set of 10,000 examples is specifically recommended to have a good chance of detecting a 0.1% improvement.
Rubric: The response must accurately state that dev sets commonly range from 1,000 to 10,000 examples. It must also explain that a dev set of 10,000 examples provides a good chance of detecting an improvement of 0.1%, contrasting this with how smaller dev sets make detecting such minor changes difficult due to variance and noise.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Machine Learning Strategy
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
How many dev set examples does Andrew Ng recommend to reliably detect a 0.1% accuracy improvement?
True or False: A dev set of 1,000 examples gives you a good chance of detecting a 0.1% accuracy improvement.
Dev sets with _____ to 10,000 examples are described as common in Machine Learning Yearning.
Which range represents the common size for a dev set according to Andrew Ng's Machine Learning Yearning?
True or False: A dev set of 10,000 examples gives you a good chance of detecting an accuracy improvement of 0.1%.
With _____ dev set examples, you have a good chance of detecting an accuracy improvement of 0.1%.
Match each dev set concept to its correct description.
Order the steps for reasoning about whether your dev set is large enough to detect a 0.1% improvement.
What accuracy improvement can you expect to reliably detect with a 10,000-example dev set, per Machine Learning Yearning?
True or False: A dev set of 1,000 examples is too small to fall within the commonly recommended dev set size range.
Dev sets with sizes from _____ to 10,000 examples are considered common in practice.
Match each dev set scenario to its correct outcome or classification.
Order the reasoning steps behind Andrew Ng's recommendation of 10,000 examples for detecting 0.1% improvements.
Explain the relationship between dev set size and the ability to detect minor accuracy improvements, citing common size ranges.
Evaluating a Dev Set Size for Detecting 0.1% Classifier Improvements
Determining the Dev Set Size for 0.1% Performance Changes