Explain why more training data can raise training error while lowering dev error.
Question: In a concise analytical response, explain why training and dev error can move in opposite directions as training-set size grows.
Sample answer: A very small training set can often be memorized, producing near-zero training error. As more examples are added, fitting every training example becomes harder, especially when some examples are ambiguous or mislabeled, so training error usually rises. At the same time, dev error should decrease as the training set grows.
Key points:
- Small training sets can be memorized.
- Training error usually increases with training-set size.
- Ambiguous or mislabeled examples make perfect fitting harder.
- Dev error should decrease as training-set size grows.
Rubric: A strong response accurately identifies both error trends and connects rising training error to reduced memorization and the difficulty of fitting larger, potentially ambiguous or mislabeled datasets.
0
1
References
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Machine Learning Yearning (Deeplearning.ai)
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Strategy
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
How does training error usually change as the training set grows?
A tiny training set can make training performance look deceptively strong.
As training-set size grows, training error usually _____.
Match each dataset condition to its expected error behavior.
Order the reasoning that explains rising training error.
Explain why more training data can raise training error while lowering dev error.
Diagnose the error trends after a cat classifier receives more training examples.
Why can two training examples produce 0% training error?
Which observation best fits the expected learning-curve pattern?
A rise in training error with more data necessarily contradicts the expected pattern.