Explain why the example illustrates a limitation of a small dev set.
Question: In a concise analytical response, explain what the comparison between 90.0% and 90.1% accuracy shows about a dev set containing 100 examples.
Sample answer: The example shows that a 100-example dev set is too small to detect a 0.1 percentage-point accuracy difference between classifiers scoring 90.0% and 90.1%. Thus, it cannot distinguish this tiny accuracy change. The author also describes 100 examples as small compared with dev sets in other machine learning problems the author has seen.
Key points:
- The dev set contains 100 examples.
- The classifier accuracies are 90.0% and 90.1%.
- The difference is 0.1 percentage point.
- The 100-example dev set cannot detect this difference.
- The author considers 100 examples small compared with other machine learning problems observed.
Rubric: A strong response identifies the 100-example dev set, the 90.0% versus 90.1% comparison, the 0.1 percentage-point difference, and the conclusion that this difference cannot be detected. It should also accurately state the author's comparison with other machine learning problems.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Machine Learning Strategy
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
What can a 100-example dev set reveal about 90.0% versus 90.1% accuracy?
Can 100 dev examples detect a 0.1 percentage-point accuracy difference?
A 100-example dev set cannot detect a _____ percentage-point accuracy difference.
Match each element of the example to its source-based description.
Order the reasoning used to assess the 100-example dev set.
Explain why the example illustrates a limitation of a small dev set.
Diagnose whether a small dev set can distinguish two nearly equal classifiers.
Why is the 100-example dev set inadequate in the source example?
Which observation best supports calling the dev set too small for this comparison?
Does the author characterize 100 dev examples as small?