Find the evaluation-set mismatch in a voice-command detector.
Case context: A startup builds a detector for the phrase "start recording." Most training examples are clean studio clips collected from volunteers. However, the product will be used in cars, where voices are often mixed with road noise, music, and changing microphone quality. The model looks strong on the current evaluation set but fails on real in-car recordings.
Question: What problem should the team identify, and how should it change its dev and test sets?
Sample answer: The team should identify that its evaluation data comes from a cleaner distribution than the one the product must handle. It should rebuild the dev and test sets from in-car voice recordings because those match the future operating conditions and the distribution that matters for product performance. The clean studio clips can still be valuable as extra training data.
Key points:
- Clean studio clips are not the same as in-car recordings.
- The evaluation set does not match the target use case.
- Dev and test data should come from in-car conditions.
- Studio clips may still help during training.
Rubric: The answer should state that the evaluation set is drawn from the wrong distribution, choose in-car recordings for dev and test, explain the choice in terms of the intended deployment setting, and not say that the clean studio data must be removed from training.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Strategy
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
Do Not Randomly Mix Sources When Building Validation and Test Sets
Use a Small Amount of Target-Distribution Data in Training with Auxiliary Data
When to Reduce the Influence of Extra Training Data
Training-Development Set
Comparing Errors Across Two Data Sources
Training–Dev Distribution Gap
Domain adaptation solves only certain distribution-shift problems
Choosing Development and Test Data for a Specific Application
Factory Photos and Inspection Tablet Images as a Distribution Mismatch Example
Random Train/Test Splits Can Be Misleading When Deployment Data Differs
Which data should define the dev and test sets for the plant-disease app?
Development and test examples should be drawn to match the kind of data the deployed system is expected to see.
Development and test sets should match the kind of data you expect later.
Match each data group for the plant-disease app with its role.
Order the dataset choices when training data and evaluation data come from different sources.
Why training data and evaluation data may come from different sources
Find the evaluation-set mismatch in a voice-command detector.
Why did strong desktop-photo results not predict mobile-upload success?
Choosing Training and Evaluation Data from Two Image Sources
If training uses extra web-sourced photos, the dev and test sets must also contain web-sourced photos.