Learn Before
Flaw with Searle’s Chinese Room Argument
John Searle’s Chinese Room Argument has a flaw: cheating is impossible. People challenge the mini-turing test because they believe it is easy to cheat since the machine can just memorize a list of questions, their answers, and then spit it out from memory, making it indistinguishable from how people actually think (through mental causal models). However, when trying to pass the mini-tuning test, even if there are a small number of causal variables, the number of questions grows astronomically, even more so when you continue to increase the number of variables. This means that the question-answer list would grow so large that it becomes improbably big. This can never simulate the intelligence of human beings.
0
2
Tags
Data Science