Human Level Performance
Human-Level Performance is the error a person may get. It's usually based on what your objective is. On the opposite to that is the Bayes (optimal) error which is the theoretical error. And this error may not be 0. Since there might be some impossible cases to classify, e.g., a picture that is too blurry to be recognized. Before surpassing human-level performance, the accuracy will be improved greatly. However, when it passes the line, it will get harder since you cannot learn from human, and you don't know what the true Bayes error is.

0
4
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Data Science
Related
Human Level Performance
Bayes Error Rate for (Naive) Bayes Classifier
Human Level Performance
Avoidable bias
If your goal is to have “human-level performance” be a proxy (or estimate) for Bayes error, how would you define “human-level performance”?
Human Level Proxy for Bayes Error
Which of the following statements about algorithmic performance do you agree with?
Bayes Calssifier and Bayes Error Rate
Learn After
Human Level Proxy for Bayes Error
If your goal is to have “human-level performance” be a proxy (or estimate) for Bayes error, how would you define “human-level performance”?
Human Level Performance: Based on the evidence below, which two of the following four options seem the most promising to try?
Which of the following statements about algorithmic performance do you agree with?