Short Answer

Imagine you are writing the limitations section of a research proposal for an online survey on adjustment. Apply empirical evidence regarding internet survey data quality to write a brief rebuttal (1-3 sentences) to a hypothetical reviewer who claims your online sample is psychologically maladjusted compared to a traditional sample.

Question: Imagine you are writing the limitations section of a research proposal for an online survey on adjustment. Apply empirical evidence regarding internet survey data quality to write a brief rebuttal (1-3 sentences) to a hypothetical reviewer who claims your online sample is psychologically maladjusted compared to a traditional sample.

Sample answer: While reviewers may worry that internet samples are uniquely maladjusted or depressed, empirical research shows that internet users and nonusers do not differ on psychological markers of adjustment and depression. Therefore, using an online survey is not expected to introduce systemic bias regarding participants' psychological health.

Key points:

  • Defends online survey methodology against claims of psychological bias.
  • Applies the finding that internet users and nonusers share similar psychological markers.
  • Concludes that the online sample is not inherently more maladjusted or depressed.

Rubric: To earn full credit, the response must: 1. Apply empirical findings to defend the online survey method. 2. Cite the lack of difference between internet users and nonusers on adjustment/depression markers. 3. Be concise (1-3 sentences) and directly address the reviewer's concern.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related