Impact of Natural Resource Depletion on Indonesia's GDP and Growth Rate (1971-1984)
A study of Indonesia's economy demonstrates how conventional GDP calculations can overstate economic progress by failing to account for natural resource depletion. This issue affects long-term growth metrics. Over the period from 1971 to 1984, Indonesia’s official annual GDP growth rate was 7.1%. However, if the depletion of petroleum, forests, and soil were factored in, the adjusted annual growth rate would have been only 4.0%, indicating that the actual sustainable growth was significantly lower than reported. The impact is also clear in single-year figures; for instance, in 1983, the combined value of net petroleum reserve depletion and soil erosion would have reduced the nation's GDP by 22%.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Economics
CORE Econ
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.1 Prosperity, inequality, and planetary limits - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Impact of Natural Resource Depletion on Indonesia's GDP and Growth Rate (1971-1984)
Comparison of GDP Accounting Flaws in Cod and Indonesian Forest Depletion
Evaluating National Economic Performance
The principle of adjusting a nation's economic output by subtracting the value of depleted natural resources, such as minerals and timber, is based on a logical parallel to which of the following standard economic adjustments?
A nation that experiences a boom in its timber industry by clear-cutting its old-growth forests will see a corresponding rise in its standard measure of total economic output. This rise accurately reflects a sustainable increase in the nation's economic well-being.
Rationale for Modifying Economic Output Measures
Critique of Unadjusted Economic Growth
To calculate a sustainable measure of national income, adjustments for the consumption of capital assets are necessary. Match each economic event with the category that best describes its impact on the nation's stock of capital.
A country reports a gross economic output of $1 trillion for a given year. During that year, the value of its machinery and buildings decreased by $80 billion due to wear and tear. In addition, the value of its extracted and sold non-renewable mineral reserves amounted to $50 billion. To calculate a more sustainable measure of the country's net output, a total of $______ billion, representing the consumption of both man-made and natural assets, must be subtracted from the gross figure.
To create a more accurate measure of a nation's sustainable economic performance, several adjustments must be made to the standard gross output figure. Arrange the following steps in the correct logical order to calculate this adjusted net output.
Country X reports a 7% annual increase in its total economic output, driven almost entirely by rapidly harvesting and selling its ancient forests. Country Y reports a 3% annual increase, with its economy based on services and manufacturing, while also investing heavily to maintain its existing factories and equipment. Considering the principle that a true measure of economic performance must account for the 'using up' of all productive assets, which statement best analyzes the situation?
Critique of a 'Growth-First' Economic Policy
Impact of Income Inequality on Wellbeing with Constant Average Income
Factors Affecting Wellbeing Beyond Purchased Goods and Services
Trade-off Between Environmental Preservation and Economic Activity
Adjusting Economic Output for Natural Resource Depletion
Impact of Natural Resource Depletion on Indonesia's GDP and Growth Rate (1971-1984)
Robert Kennedy's Critique of GDP
Evaluating Living Standards Beyond Average Income
Country X and Country Y both report an identical average income per person of $50,000. However, in Country X, the wealthiest 10% of the population earns 90% of the total national income, while in Country Y, the income is distributed much more evenly. Based on this information, which of the following statements best explains why the average income figure is a potentially misleading indicator of the typical citizen's standard of living in this comparison?
A nation's average income per person has doubled in the last decade due to a massive expansion of its industrial sector. During the same period, air and water quality have deteriorated significantly, leading to widespread public health issues. Why might the change in average income per person be an inaccurate reflection of the change in the overall standard of living for this nation's population?
Evaluating Living Standards Beyond Average Income
Two countries, Country A and Country B, have identical average income per person. However, the average citizen in Country A works 35 hours per week, while the average citizen in Country B works 55 hours per week to achieve this income. A politician claims that because the average incomes are the same, the standard of living is also the same in both countries. Which of the following statements best critiques this claim?
If a country's total spending on home security systems and prison construction increases, its total measured economic output will rise. This rise in output is a clear and unambiguous indicator of an improved standard of living for its citizens.
Policy Evaluation Beyond Average Income
Match each scenario with the specific limitation of using average income per person as the sole measure of a population's standard of living that it best illustrates.
Critique of Economic Growth as a Measure of Well-being
A government report proudly announces a 5% increase in the nation's average income per person over the past year. A critic argues, "This figure alone tells us very little about whether the typical citizen is actually better off." Which of the following potential underlying scenarios provides the strongest support for the critic's argument?
Learn After
Comparison of GDP Accounting Flaws in Cod and Indonesian Forest Depletion
A developing nation reported an average annual economic growth rate of 7.1% over a 13-year period. However, a revised analysis accounting for the depletion of its petroleum reserves, forests, and soil during that same period calculated an adjusted annual growth rate of only 4.0%. Based on these two figures, what is the most accurate conclusion?
Calculating Adjusted Economic Output
Advising on Sustainable Economic Measurement
Evaluating Economic Performance in a Resource-Rich Nation
Between 1971 and 1984, Indonesia's reported average annual GDP growth of 7.1% accurately represented the net increase in the nation's total wealth, which includes both manufactured capital and natural resource assets.
A study of a resource-rich country's economy from 1971 to 1984 produced several key figures. Match each figure or concept to its correct description regarding the measurement of national economic performance.
A resource-dependent nation's officially reported Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for a specific year was $90 billion. An economic analysis later determined that if the value of depleted petroleum reserves and soil erosion from that year were subtracted from the official GDP, the adjusted figure would have been 22% lower. Based on this information, the total value of the depleted natural resources for that year was $____ billion. (Enter a number only)
A country wants to calculate a measure of its economic output that accounts for the consumption of its natural assets. Arrange the following steps in the correct logical order to arrive at this adjusted figure.
Evaluating Policy Claims with Adjusted Economic Data
Explaining Adjusted Growth Metrics