Learn Before
Implementing Justice in Research: Beyond Equitable Selection
The article emphasizes that justice in research must extend beyond equitable selection also to ensure that disabled participants benefit from the knowledge and interventions their involvement makes possible. Too often, disabled people contribute data and bear risks, yet structural barriers and ableist research priorities prevent them from accessing the outcomes. From this perspective, advancing justice requires participatory research models that elevate disabled voices, challenge “normalizing” assumptions, and work toward a fairer redistribution of research benefits.
0
1
Tags
Disability Studies
Educational Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Psychology
Related
Research Involvement of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
Social/Scientific Value
Scientific Validity
Favorable Risk–Benefit Ratio
Independent Review Boards
Ethical Aspects of the Abuse of Pharmaceutical Enhancements by Healthy People in the Context of Improving Cognitive Functions
"The White Version of Cheating?" Ethical and Social Equity Concerns of Cognitive Enhancing Drug Users in Higher Education.
Stigma in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
ADHD and Identity Formation: Adolescents' Experiences From the Healthcare System and Peer Relationships
Implementing Justice in Research: Beyond Equitable Selection
Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI
Definition Drives Design: Disability Models and Mechanisms of Bias in AI Technologies
This Is What a Historicist and Relativist Feminist Philosophy of Disability Looks Like
Chapter 1 Section 1: A Naturalized Narrative