Incommensurability of Catastrophic Costs in Economic Analysis
Standard cost-benefit analysis faces a significant challenge when dealing with potential catastrophic outcomes, such as human extinction. The immense negative value of such events is difficult to weigh against more familiar, everyday costs and benefits. This difficulty in comparing existential risks with routine trade-offs complicates decision-making, even when the probability of the catastrophe is considered to be very small.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Macroeconomics Course
Ch.8 Economic dynamics: Financial and environmental crises - The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) (Definition and Formula)
Environmental Tipping Points
Fundamental Uncertainty
Risk vs. Fundamental Uncertainty in Decision-Making
Incommensurability of Catastrophic Costs in Economic Analysis
Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Uncertainty and Catastrophic Risk
A city is experiencing significant air pollution from traffic. A policymaker proposes a complete ban on all private vehicle use within the city center to eliminate this pollution entirely. From an economic perspective focused on maximizing society's total well-being, what is the most significant potential flaw in this proposal?
Determining Optimal Pollution Reduction
Optimal Pollution Abatement Level
Critique of an Environmental Policy Stance
A government agency is analyzing the costs and benefits of reducing emissions from a local factory. The table below shows the marginal social cost and marginal social benefit for different levels of pollution reduction.
Pollution Reduction (tons) Marginal Social Cost ($) Marginal Social Benefit ($) 10 2,000 10,000 20 4,000 8,000 30 6,000 6,000 40 8,000 4,000 50 10,000 2,000 To maximize the total net benefit to society, what level of pollution reduction should the agency aim for?
A government has implemented a policy to reduce industrial emissions. If it is discovered that the marginal cost to society of the last ton of emissions reduced is greater than the marginal benefit to society from that reduction, this indicates that the current policy is not stringent enough and should be tightened to further decrease emissions.
A government is evaluating its policies for reducing industrial pollution. Match each economic scenario with its correct policy implication for maximizing social well-being.
Setting an Optimal Pollution Tax
Rationale for Environmental Policy Optimization
A city government implemented a tax on single-use plastic bags, which successfully reduced their use. A new study reveals that at the current level of bag reduction, the additional societal benefit gained from eliminating one more bag is now significantly less than the additional societal cost (in terms of price and inconvenience) of doing so. Based on this information, which of the following actions would move the city closer to an economically optimal outcome?