Jose-Luis Jimenez twitter thread on misuse of image to explain modes of transmission
"2/ First, cutpoint of falling to ground (droplets) vs. floating and being inhalable (aerosols) is ~50 um, not 5 um.
Second, image gives impression that close proximity infection is all droplets. Aerosols only seem to infect at long range. Totally incorrect.
3/ Aerosol infect best at close proximity. See https://medscape.com/viewarticle/934837?src=uc_mscpedt&faf=1#vp_1 for further details and references. And see this corrected image.
4/ PS: when I bring up the fact that the 5 um cutoff defies the laws of physics, I often hear crickets from "the other side." Sound like if some people thought "microns, schmicrons", not important at all.
Remember that if 5 um = squirrel, 50 um = elephant. VERY different motion!
5/ This error is to an aerosol scientist what it would be to an ID physician if we confused a virus for a bacterium. (And then, when corrected, replied "microbe, schmicrobe.")
This stuff does matter to understand transmission, and it is not "theoretical" or "academic.""
0
1
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences