Relation
Limitations (Mercury: Empowering Programmers’ Mobile Work Practices with Microproductivity)
- The lab study’s design was strongly grounded in observations made in the field, so further studies are needed to claim that the same observations may be seen in-the-wild or consistently over time.
- The evaluation does not compare microproductivity tools to nonmicroproductivity tools for on-the-go work.
- The study’s population consisted primarily of professional and experienced software engineers at a large technology corporation.
- Future research is needed to understand how Mercury can be adapted to scenarios where documentation is significantly limited or unavailable entirely.
0
1
Updated 2021-06-14
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Mercury (Programmer's tool for micro-productivity)
RQ (Mercury: Empowering Programmers’ Mobile Work Practices with Microproductivity)
Methodology (Mercury: Empowering Programmers’ Mobile Work Practices with Microproductivity)
Results (Mercury: Empowering Programmers’ Mobile Work Practices with Microproductivity)
Limitations (Mercury: Empowering Programmers’ Mobile Work Practices with Microproductivity)