Mapping Operational Gaps to Runtime Control Points
Long-horizon agent execution failures are structured into three distinct operational gaps, each mapped to a specific control intervention in a stateful harness runtime:
- Epistemic Gap: Relevant knowledge or methods are unavailable at the decision point; targeted by state-local context and entry hooks (
in_hook) that reintroduce phase-specific guidance. - Procedural-Compliance Gap: An active procedure is left incomplete or not adhered to within a run; targeted by checked transitions, contract boundaries, and pre-commit checks (
before_transfer) that block invalid handoffs. - Procedural-Memory Gap: Lessons diagnosed in earlier executions fail to be retained across runs; targeted by versioned practices and reusable runbook rules that accumulate procedural experience outside model weights.
0
1
Tags
Prep Sessions
Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Ch.1 Foundations and Operational Challenges - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Operational Gaps in Long-Horizon Agent Execution - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Related
Epistemic Gap in Autonomous Agent Execution
Procedural-Compliance Gap in Autonomous Agent Execution
Mapping Operational Gaps to Runtime Control Points
Procedural-Memory Gap in Autonomous Agents
How does an epistemic gap fundamentally differ from a procedural failure in autonomous agent execution?
In stateful agent runtimes, state-local entry hooks target epistemic gaps by reactivating relevant domain context or tool guidance precisely at the phase where it becomes actionable.
An epistemic gap is an execution failure condition where what three types of information or guidance are unavailable to the agent at a critical decision point?
Mapping Operational Gaps to Runtime Control Points
An agent overseeing a system update completes software installation and immediately signals successful completion, omitting the mandatory post-installation service restart specified in its active run instructions. Which operational action exemplifies this failure within the execution trace?
When an autonomous agent encounters a procedural-compliance gap, a stateful harness allows task handoff to proceed as long as the agent records the departure in its execution trace.
In autonomous agent execution, how does a procedural-compliance gap differ from an epistemic gap and a procedural-memory gap?
Mapping Operational Gaps to Runtime Control Points
Learn After
Which operational gap is characterized by relevant knowledge or methods being unavailable at an agent's decision point?
In a stateful harness runtime, pre-commit checks (
before_transfer) and checked transitions are designed to block invalid handoffs when an active procedure is left incomplete.Which operational gap describes execution lessons failing to carry over across runs, and what runtime control points target it?