Procedural-Compliance Gap in Autonomous Agent Execution
A procedural-compliance gap is an intra-run execution failure mode where the correct procedure is active and accessible to the agent, but remains incomplete, partially executed, or improperly followed. In contrast to epistemic gaps (missing knowledge) or procedural-memory gaps (failure to carry over lessons across runs), a procedural-compliance gap occurs within a single execution trace when an agent departs from a plan or attempts premature termination. Stateful harnesses mitigate this gap by establishing contract boundaries, checked transitions, edge guards, and explicit before-transfer checks that physically block handoff until mandatory conditions are satisfied.
0
1
Tags
Prep Sessions
Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Ch.1 Foundations and Operational Challenges - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Operational Gaps in Long-Horizon Agent Execution - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Learn After
An agent overseeing a system update completes software installation and immediately signals successful completion, omitting the mandatory post-installation service restart specified in its active run instructions. Which operational action exemplifies this failure within the execution trace?
When an autonomous agent encounters a procedural-compliance gap, a stateful harness allows task handoff to proceed as long as the agent records the departure in its execution trace.
In autonomous agent execution, how does a procedural-compliance gap differ from an epistemic gap and a procedural-memory gap?
Mapping Operational Gaps to Runtime Control Points