Concept
Misinformation Warning Labels: Twitter's Soft Moderation Effects on COVID-19 Vaccine Belief Echoes Methodology
- Split research into 4 steps – preconditions, safety and herd immunity, efficacy and hesitancy, and political affiliation
- Want to determine whether seeing tweets with misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine impacts people’s views regarding the accuracy of information on Twitter with or without warning covers and tags and for verified vs. non-verified accounts
- 4 different comparisons – misleading tweets with vs. without a warning tag & without vs. without warning cover; verified tweets with vs. without warning tags & without vs. without warning covers (verified account used was “TheVirusMonitor”)
- Conducted an anonymous survey from January to February of 2021 where 319 participants were randomly put into 1 of 6 groups – misleading tweet with warning tag, misleading tweet without warning tag, misleading tweet with warning cover; verified tweet, verified tweet with warning tag, verified tweet with warning cover
- Used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare user perceptions towards the tweets
0
1
Updated 2021-04-29
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Misinformation Warning Labels: Twitter's Soft Moderation Effects on COVID-19 Vaccine Belief Echoes
Misinformation Warning Labels: Twitter's Soft Moderation Effects on COVID-19 Vaccine Belief Echoes Background
Misinformation Warning Labels: Twitter's Soft Moderation Effects on COVID-19 Vaccine Belief Echoes Methodology