Learn Before
Neurodiversity and its implications for researchers
Historically, research on neurodevelopmental disorders has relied on the medical model which focused on curing disabilities. There is a new movement away from that and towards a new more neurodiversity affirming model.
-
The scope of research on neurodivergent individuals can be broadened to talk about strengths, not just weaknesses.
-
Research regarding neurodivergent people may be biased.
-
There are unequal power dynamics in research where researchers have more power than the neurodivergent people do.
-
Researchers studying neurodiversity have a duty to engage in community advocacy and be aware of the historical harms that have been done to the community through research
-
Researchers should be aware of the language that they are using and try to use neutral or strengths-based language
0
1
Tags
Disability Studies
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Behavioral Neuroscience
Psychology
Neuroscience (Neurobiology)
Life Science / Biology
Biomedical Sciences
Natural Science
Clinical Practice of Psychology
Related
Neurodiversity Paradigm
Pathology Paradigm
Neurological Diversity
Types of Neurodiversity
Neurodiversity References
Neurodiversity and its implications for researchers
Three models for viewing disability
References for neurodiversity & higher education
Neurodiversity & Higher Education
Transforming How We Understand Academic Thinking