Open-Ended Comments on Satisfaction by Personality and Environment

Open-Ended Comments on Dissatisfaction by Personality and Environment

- Feelers report interaction slightly more than thinkers as a factor in their satisfaction in both environments.
- Course content is mentioned more by judgers than perceivers as a factor in satisfaction in both environments.
- Dissatisfaction with the amount of interaction was mentioned more by intuitives than sensors in both environments. 
- Need for more flexibility mentioned more by feelers in blended courses.
- Judgers reported dissatisfaction with the course design as well as amount of interaction in both learning environments.

Villanova University

- Researchers used the Kruskal-Wallis test to analyze differences in satisfaction among the learning environments and MBTI scales.
- No significant differences were found between extraverts and introverts or judgers and perceivers.
- Intuitives in online courses were significantly more satisfied with the use of threaded discussion and quality of interaction with other students than those in blended courses.
- Intuitives in online courses were significantly more satisfied with course outcomes than intuitives in blended courses. In other words, they ranked higher on survey questions in the outcomes subscale.
- Feelers in online courses were significantly more satisfied with the use of threaded online discussions than those in blended courses.

Results: Satisfaction among Personality Types and Learning Environments

Bolliger, D., & Erichsen, E. (2013). Student satisfaction with blended and online courses based on personality type. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(1).

Learn Before

Related

Learn After