Learn Before
Physiological evidence for BDMA is not necessarily valid
Decreased activity of the striatum, resulting in less dopaminergic activity does not necessarily equate to a clinical implication. Physiological differences can be presented for a variety of reasons and do not necessarily correspond to illness. Furthermore, the overlap of results between control groups and experimental groups can suggest that despite the decreased activity of the striatum, the dopaminergic differences of drug users (such as methamphetamine users) are not clinically significant.
0
1
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Addiction
Behavioral Neuroscience
Neuroscience (Neurobiology)
Life Science / Biology
Biomedical Sciences
Natural Science
1Cademy
Related
Sociocultural limitations of BDMA
Dosing regiment limitations of BDMA
Long-term effects of drug use as a limitation of BDMA
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Experimental design of cross-sectional studies can be confounded in BDMA
Physiological evidence for BDMA is not necessarily valid
Imaging techniques and clinical studies are not representative of BDMA
PET scan limitations as an evidence source of BDMA