Point (21, 90) as a Suboptimal Choice on the Feasible Frontier
The point with coordinates (21, 90), representing 21 hours of free time and €90 of consumption, is one of the two intersection points between indifference curve IC2 and the feasible frontier. Like other intersection points, this choice is feasible but suboptimal. Karim could achieve a higher level of utility by moving along the feasible frontier to a point on a higher indifference curve, such as the tangency point E on IC3.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.3 Doing the best you can: Scarcity, wellbeing, and working hours - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Infeasibility of an Entire Indifference Curve
Activity: Identifying Karim's Optimal Choice on the Feasible Frontier
Point (21, 90) as a Suboptimal Choice on the Feasible Frontier
Suboptimality of Intersection Points ('Could Do Better' Scenarios)
Feasible Frontier in Figure 3.7a
Point C (15.5, 255) as a Feasible but Suboptimal Choice
Figure 3.7b - MRS and MRT Values
Varying Preferences and Choices Under Identical Constraints
Point B (9.5, 435) as an Intersection on IC1
Point D (12, 360) as an Intersection on IC2
Activity: Evaluating Statements Based on Figure 3.7a
Karim's Optimal Choice at Point E (17, 210): The Balance of MRS and MRT
Incentive to Decrease Free Time when MRT > MRS
Learn After
An individual is choosing between daily free time (on the horizontal axis) and consumption (on the vertical axis). Their possible combinations are shown by a downward-sloping feasible frontier. Their preferences are represented by indifference curves, where curves further from the origin signify higher satisfaction.
At Point X, the individual's indifference curve intersects (crosses) their feasible frontier. At this specific point, the slope of the indifference curve is steeper than the slope of the feasible frontier.
Based on this information, which statement provides the correct analysis of Point X?
Consider a person choosing between two desirable outcomes, with their possible combinations represented by a feasible frontier and their preferences by a set of indifference curves. If this person chooses a combination where their current indifference curve intersects (crosses) the feasible frontier, it means they have found a combination from which they cannot improve their overall satisfaction.
Analyzing a Suboptimal Choice
Optimizing Choices on the Feasible Frontier
Evaluating a Consumption-Leisure Choice
An individual is making a choice between two goods, represented on a graph. Their possible combinations are defined by a downward-sloping feasible frontier, and their preferences are shown by a set of indifference curves. Match each described point with its correct economic classification.
An individual is analyzing their choice between two goods. They notice that at their current consumption bundle, which lies on their feasible frontier, their indifference curve crosses the frontier instead of just touching it. Arrange the following steps in the logical order they should follow to find a new bundle that maximizes their satisfaction.
An individual is choosing a combination of two goods. Their set of possible combinations is represented by a feasible frontier, and their preferences are shown by indifference curves. If, at their chosen point on the frontier, their indifference curve crosses through the frontier rather than just touching it tangentially, this indicates that their choice is ______ because they could achieve a higher level of satisfaction by moving to a different point along the frontier.
Evaluating an Economic Choice
An individual is choosing between hours of free time and daily consumption, constrained by a feasible frontier. They are currently at a point on this frontier where their indifference curve intersects it. At this specific point, the rate at which they are willing to trade consumption for an extra hour of free time is greater than the rate at which the frontier allows them to. Specifically, they are willing to give up €4 of consumption for one more hour of free time, but they only have to give up €3 of consumption to gain that hour.
Based on this information, which action would allow the individual to reach a higher level of satisfaction?