Policy Gradient Theorem
We want to maximize the rewards based on parameters , so we can use the expected return of policy π starting from a given state as the objective function: where and is the discounted state distribution ((meaning the probability of being at state s when following policy 𝜋))
According to Policy Gradient Theorem,
is the gradient of 𝜋 given s and 𝜽 and the simplest way to estimate it is to use a score function gradient estimator because
is the action value function under 𝜋, the simplest way to estimate it is use the cumulative return from entire trajectories.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Data Science
Ch.4 Alignment - Foundations of Large Language Models
Foundations of Large Language Models
Foundations of Large Language Models Course
Computing Sciences
Related
REINFORCE Algorithm (Monte-Carlo Policy Gradient)
Policy Gradient Theorem
High Variance in Policy Gradient Estimates
Refining Utility Estimation with Importance Sampling in Policy Gradients
Trust Region in Reinforcement Learning Optimization
Policy Gradient Theorem
Advantage of Policy Gradients: Non-Differentiable Reward Functions
Decomposition of the Trajectory Log-Probability Gradient
Policy Gradient Objective with Advantage Function
Policy Gradient Estimate under Uniform Trajectory Probability
Score Function in Policy Gradients
During the derivation of the policy performance gradient, a key step transforms the expression
Σ [∂Pr_θ(τ)/∂θ] R(τ)into a form that includes the term∂log Pr_θ(τ)/∂θ. What is the primary analytical purpose of this transformation?The following equations represent key steps in deriving the policy gradient. Arrange them in the correct logical order, starting from the initial gradient of the objective function to its final form as an expectation. Note: J(θ) is the objective function, Pr_θ(τ) is the probability of a trajectory τ under policy parameters θ, and R(τ) is the reward for that trajectory.
Analyzing a Flawed Policy Gradient Derivation
Learn After
Equivalence of Surrogate and On-Policy Gradients at the Reference Point
In a reinforcement learning scenario, an agent is in a particular state and has two possible actions, Action A and Action B. The agent's current parameterized policy assigns a non-zero probability to both actions. After sampling several trajectories, the agent estimates that the expected cumulative reward for taking Action A from this state is +10, while the expected cumulative reward for taking Action B from this state is -5. Based on the fundamental principle of updating a policy to maximize expected returns, how will the gradient update affect the probabilities of these actions?
Diagnosing Learning Issues in Policy Gradients
An agent's learning process involves updating its decision-making parameters (θ) based on experience. The update rule is proportional to the expression: Σ_s ρ(s) Σ_a ∇_θ π(s,a) Q(s,a). Match each mathematical component from this expression to its conceptual role in guiding the learning update.