Concept
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Study 1 Results
- 322 of the tweets showed agreement between snopee and snoper, but 93 were categorized as non-correction tweets and only 229 were correction tweets
- Out of the 229 correction tweets, 135 (59%) were accepted by the snopee
- People are more likely to respond to mutual friends (44%) than complete strangers (24%)
- Acceptance rate of 39% when both snopees and snopers are strangers, 73% when mutual friends, 64% when snopees follow snopers, and 79% when snopers follow snopees
- Acceptance rate is increased most (by 3.4 times) when only the snoper follows the snopee
- Higher acceptance rate when the number of mutual followers is greater
0
1
Updated 2021-07-05
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Identifying Snopes
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Types of Tweets
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Characterizing snoper-snopee relationships
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Categorizing snopes and responses
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Analysis
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? - Study 1 Results