Learn Before
Study on the Prevalence of Low-Credibility Information on Twitter During the COVID-19 Outbreak
A 2020 study by Yang et al. analyzed the prevalence of low-credibility COVID-19 information on Twitter. The findings indicated that low-credibility information was relatively uncommon compared to high-quality, factual information. However, social bots were significantly more active than human users in spreading and posting the low-credibility content.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media
Coronavirus goes viral: quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter
The COVID‑19 social media infodemic
Characterizing COVID-19 Misinformation Communities Using a Novel Twitter Dataset
Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation
A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter
COVID-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information
Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study
Misinformation Warning Labels: Twitter's Soft Moderation Effects on COVID-19 Vaccine Belief Echoes
An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter
Mining Trends of COVID-19 Vaccine Beliefs on Twitter with Lexical Embeddings
Study on the Prevalence of Low-Credibility Information on Twitter During the COVID-19 Outbreak