Recentering the Paper on Auditable Evaluation Evidence (Dropping Earlier Semantic-Constraint Analyses)
The Introduction explicitly recenters the paper on contributions that the released evidence base can support: strict-parity outputs, paired-bootstrap summaries, leakage audits, latency logs, separate token-cap diagnostics, and traceability assets. Correspondingly, earlier exploratory semantic-constraint analyses are not used here. This is a deliberate scope decision: claims are pulled back to what the auditable artifacts can defend, rather than carried forward from exploratory work whose evidence is not part of the released bundle. It is what allows the headline results to be read as evaluation-and-artifact contributions rather than as algorithmic claims about semantic constraints.
0
1
Tags
Science
Auditable Strict-Parity Evaluation of Prerequisite-Graph Retrieval for RAG under Leakage Controls
Related
Recentering the Paper on Auditable Evaluation Evidence (Dropping Earlier Semantic-Constraint Analyses)
Leakage Audit: Train-Test Overlap Check in Prerequisite-QA Retrieval
Claim-to-Artifact Traceability for Headline Retrieval Numbers
Qualitative Manual Bundles Released for Future Audits, Not Used for Judge Validation or Inferential Claims
Recentered Paper Scope: Earlier Exploratory Semantic-Constraint Analyses Are Excluded
Per-Table Traceability Mapping with LectureBank-Full Example
Reproducibility Artifact Bundle Contents for Hierarchical Prerequisite Graph RAG
Recentering the Paper on Auditable Evaluation Evidence (Dropping Earlier Semantic-Constraint Analyses)
Corrective Field Lesson: Four Required Ingredients for Honest Graph-RAG Claims