All assays had the capability of testing for antibodies with AUROC values greater than 0.95. The sensitivity of the assay ranged from 76.4% to 93.9% and the specificity ranged from 87.0% to 99.6%. Abbot and Roche assays had higher specificity and higher diagnostic accuracy for Covid antibodies. The ELISA assays had a higher discriminatory capacity for detecting high nAbs. Whether the goal is to detect high nAbs or to detect the presence of protective antibodies should impact which assay is chosen.

Georgetown University

The goal of this study is compare the performance of 5 commercially available serological assays to measure presence of antibodies. These serological assays are important to identify antibodies for potential plasma donation and to study the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, and potentially in the future identify immunity to SARS-CoV-

- methods 
- results 


Patel E, Bloch EM, Clarke W, et al. Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. 

Patel E, Bloch EM, Clarke W, et al. Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020;2020.08.31.20184788. Published 2020 Sep 2. doi:10.1101/2020.08.31.20184788

Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-coV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers. 

Results

To evaluate the performance of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2, 214 patients previously infected with the virus were tested using 5 different commercially available assays. The diagnostic accuracy of these assays was then compared using statistical measures.

Learn Before

Related